2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00367-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
103
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter, the clinical aim of maximizing damage in the tumor sites while minimizing damages to healthy surrounding tissue has lead to the use of protons and, more recently, carbon ions to provide high spatial-specifi c damage profi les [13][14][15][16][17][18]. In radiation or particle therapy there is a possibility that the particle interacts directly with critical components of the cell or with water.…”
Section: C-ion Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the latter, the clinical aim of maximizing damage in the tumor sites while minimizing damages to healthy surrounding tissue has lead to the use of protons and, more recently, carbon ions to provide high spatial-specifi c damage profi les [13][14][15][16][17][18]. In radiation or particle therapy there is a possibility that the particle interacts directly with critical components of the cell or with water.…”
Section: C-ion Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these radicals are extremely reactive, the diffusion length must be within about 20Å from the target. Recently, good effective radiotoxic responses from C-ion tumor therapy was reported [14][15][16][17][18]. The high ionization densities within the Bragg peak make normal DNA enzymatic repair diffi cult in contrast to low LET (Linear Energy Transfer) electron, proton and photon irradiation [13].…”
Section: C-ion Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutron experience taught us that late effects of high-LET radiations can have a higher RBE than the acute effects from neutrons [119]. A handicap in the evaluation of late effects is that the follow-up time of patients treated with carbon or neon ions is considerably shorter than patients treated with protons [23,25,57,70,78,79,98,99,111,112].…”
Section: Carbon Ion Beam Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon ions were selected for clinical trials, because they have the biologic characteristics of high LET, with 78 KeV/m at the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), and because they show good dose-localizing properties compared with heavier ions. These advantages have been shown in various cancers 3,16,27,28,33,36) . Preliminary results of phase II clinical trials have shown extremely favorable therapeutic results in the treatment of head and neck cancers (including oral cancers) that were otherwise intractable with conventional photon radiation 16,27) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The efficacy of carbon ion therapy has been demonstrated in clinical trials at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Chiba, Japan, since 1994 16,27,29,40) . Carbon ions were selected for clinical trials, because they have the biologic characteristics of high LET, with 78 KeV/m at the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), and because they show good dose-localizing properties compared with heavier ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%