2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Footprint as a basis for a cleaner research institute in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at the largest research institute in Mexico, Güereca et al (2013) find that the fraction of Scope 3 is 53% of their total carbon emissions. Estimating carbon emissions for the US cheese and whey industry, Kim et al (2013) show the importance of establishing a benchmark for supply chain carbon emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the largest research institute in Mexico, Güereca et al (2013) find that the fraction of Scope 3 is 53% of their total carbon emissions. Estimating carbon emissions for the US cheese and whey industry, Kim et al (2013) show the importance of establishing a benchmark for supply chain carbon emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scopes of our study and their categories are based on the guidance provided by the GHG Protocol (WRI/WBCSD, 2004), and on the emission source and classifications used by GHG studies on university campuses ( Alvarez et al, 2014;Güereca et al, 2013;Moerschbaecher and Day, 2010). The following steps were used in order to determine the GHG emissions related to each category:…”
Section: Categories Evaluated By the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2011) measured carbon performance through a consumptionbased carbon footprint in De Montfort University in the United Kingdom; Larsen et al (2013) calculated the GHG emissions in the Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Güereca et al (2013) presented an inventory of GHG emissions in the Engineering Institute of the Universidad Aut onoma de M exico during 2010; while Klein-Banai and Theis (2013) analyzed the factors that affect the GHG emissions in higher education institutions in the United States. One of the principal methodologies for evaluating GHG emissions used in these studies is the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate (WRI/WBCSD, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No caso de disposição em aterro sanitário, a decomposição do resíduo libera, sobretudo, dióxido de carbono, metano, amônia e o gás sulfídrico (BRASIL, 2015). (USP, 2013;OZAWA-MEIDA et al, 2013;GÜERECA et al, 2013;LARSEN et al, 2013;ALVAREZ et al, 2014;LI et al, 2015;KLEIN-BANAI;THEIS, 2013 (GÜERECA et al, 2013). Na NTNU, a pegada de carbono calculada foi de 4,6 toneladas de CO 2 eq por estudante, no ano de 2009, sendo que os departamentos de engenharia, ciências naturais e medicina contribuíram muito mais para esse valor do que os departamentos de ciências sociais e humanas.…”
Section: -Introduçãounclassified
“…As viagens foram responsáveis por 16% do total de 92.000 toneladas de CO 2 eq de emissões da Universidade (LARSEN et al, 2013 KLEIN-BANAI;THEIS, 2013;USP, 2013;LARSEN et al, 2013;ALVAREZ et al, 2014;GÜERECA et al, 2013).…”
Section: -Introduçãounclassified