The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Scaling and Uncertainty Analysis in Ecology 2006
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4663-4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Fluxes Across Regions: Observational Constraints at Multiple Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our Biome-BGC modeling, we addressed this issue by use of ecoregion-level parametrization based on (1) observations (e.g., foliar nitrogen concentration) and (2) parameter optimization (with reference to FIA observations). In Law et al (2006), we further discuss our use of eddy covariance flux tower observations, FIA data, ecological field plot measurements, and associated Monte Carlo analyses, to characterize multiple aspects of Biome-BGC model uncertainty.…”
Section: Modeling Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our Biome-BGC modeling, we addressed this issue by use of ecoregion-level parametrization based on (1) observations (e.g., foliar nitrogen concentration) and (2) parameter optimization (with reference to FIA observations). In Law et al (2006), we further discuss our use of eddy covariance flux tower observations, FIA data, ecological field plot measurements, and associated Monte Carlo analyses, to characterize multiple aspects of Biome-BGC model uncertainty.…”
Section: Modeling Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can help improve our understanding of the feedbacks between the terrestrial biosphere and atmosphere (Law et al, 2006) and provide critical information to studying long-term biosphere interactions with other components of the Earth system (Potter et al, 2007). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that the continent of North America has been identified as a significantly large fraction of global carbon budget in terms of both source and sink of atmospheric CO 2 (Pacala et al, 2001;Gurney et al, 2002;IPCC, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the environmental limitation for simulating carbon fluxes is estimated with specific algorithms driven by uncertain environmental variables, biases between the observed and estimated environmental status can introduce uncertainty. In addition, terrestrial biogeochemical model simulations are uncertain due to lacking of large-scale disturbance data (Canadell et al, 2000;Law et al, 2006). Remotely sensed data provide globally consistent and near real-time observations of numerous surface variables as well as the information of the timing, distribution, spatial extent or severity of disturbances at regional and global scales .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the spatial pattern of ecosystem processes in the Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve in China, this study provides an example of upscaling ecophysiological and geophysical processes from the patch level to the entire landscape by integrating simulation modeling, GIS, remote sensing, and field-based observations. While the general scaling approach is similar to those used in other studies (e.g., King 1991;Wu 1999;Law et al 2006), this research has resulted in new findings that are particularly useful for understanding the structure and functioning of the CMNR landscape as well as unraveling problems and challenges in scaling up ecosystem processes across heterogeneous landscapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In spatial extrapolation through modeling, we explicitly considered the interactions of each patch with the atmosphere and soil, but horizontal interactions between patches were not explicitly considered. This is essentially the ''direct extrapolation'' method that has been widely used in landscape ecology, particularly for simulating ecosystem productivity (King 1991;Law et al 2006;Wu and Li 2006). The vegetation and soil characteristics of CMNR exhibited relatively discrete patches (Ge et al 1990), which made the hierarchical patch dynamic approach quite appropriate.…”
Section: Patch-level Model Validation and Upscaling Schemementioning
confidence: 99%