2021
DOI: 10.1002/9781119639305.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Flux Trajectories and Site Conditions from Restored Impounded Marshes in the Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S5). High CH 4 emissions at that site during our sampling may also be attributed to its recent conversion to a restored wetland and the subsequent increase in primary productivity and labile carbon inputs; CH 4 emissions have since declined both there and at West Pond over time (2012–2020) ( 47 ). High CH 4 production has also been observed in oligohaline wetlands in the Delaware River estuary where isotopic measurements indicated patterns across the salinity gradient were driven more by a lack of CH 4 consumption than by greater gross CH 4 production ( 42 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…S5). High CH 4 emissions at that site during our sampling may also be attributed to its recent conversion to a restored wetland and the subsequent increase in primary productivity and labile carbon inputs; CH 4 emissions have since declined both there and at West Pond over time (2012–2020) ( 47 ). High CH 4 production has also been observed in oligohaline wetlands in the Delaware River estuary where isotopic measurements indicated patterns across the salinity gradient were driven more by a lack of CH 4 consumption than by greater gross CH 4 production ( 42 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Methane emissions are inherently linked to plant productivity (Bridgham et al., 2013); thus, reductions in NEE due to disturbance were often accompanied by reductions in FCH 4 (Figure ) (Chamberlain et al., 2020; Sturtevant et al., 2016). Unintended short‐term water drawdowns have become more frequent in recent years, influencing FCH 4 on multiple time scales and seemingly causing an overall decreasing trend at the young and old managed wetlands (Figure ) (Valach et al., 2021). This trend contrasts with those observed at other restored nontidal wetlands in the Delta (Valach et al., 2021), suggesting that ongoing site‐specific factors might be driving FCH 4 variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unintended short‐term water drawdowns have become more frequent in recent years, influencing FCH 4 on multiple time scales and seemingly causing an overall decreasing trend at the young and old managed wetlands (Figure ) (Valach et al., 2021). This trend contrasts with those observed at other restored nontidal wetlands in the Delta (Valach et al., 2021), suggesting that ongoing site‐specific factors might be driving FCH 4 variability. The shorter record of greenhouse gas exchange at the restored tidal wetland complicates assessing interannual variability, however, the 3 years of NEE recorded at this site are similar (average: −386, range of 95 g C−CO 2 m −2 yr −1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus important to understand the drivers of wetland CH 4 emissions, especially given that there has been much recent discussion of the potential for coastal and estuarine wetlands to sequester vast quantities of carbon in what has been referred to as “blue carbon” (4–7). However, any increases in carbon (C) storage could potentially be offset by greenhouse gas emissions (810), which warrants further study and quantification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%