2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon export from fringing saltmarsh shoreline erosion overwhelms carbon storage across a critical width threshold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows the conceptual model of marsh vertical growth through sediment trapping, in concert with lateral retreat due to wave erosion (Mariotti & Carr, ). This finding indicates that models such as Theuerkauf et al () that neglect import of material via tidal channels may overestimate the export of POM and sediment. However, as Theuerkauf et al () note, without landward migration of the marsh‐land boundary, the aerial extent of the marsh will generally shrink as the marsh edge is eroded, limiting the extent to which sediment can be redeposited on the marsh and POM can be sequestered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This follows the conceptual model of marsh vertical growth through sediment trapping, in concert with lateral retreat due to wave erosion (Mariotti & Carr, ). This finding indicates that models such as Theuerkauf et al () that neglect import of material via tidal channels may overestimate the export of POM and sediment. However, as Theuerkauf et al () note, without landward migration of the marsh‐land boundary, the aerial extent of the marsh will generally shrink as the marsh edge is eroded, limiting the extent to which sediment can be redeposited on the marsh and POM can be sequestered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, as Theuerkauf et al () note, without landward migration of the marsh‐land boundary, the aerial extent of the marsh will generally shrink as the marsh edge is eroded, limiting the extent to which sediment can be redeposited on the marsh and POM can be sequestered. Accounting for tidal imports of POM through marsh channels would effectively increase the Theuerkauf et al’s () carbon storage term, as well as the amount of time required for eroding marshes to turn from sinks to sources of carbon and organic matter. Note that if marshes can retreat landward, then POM imports via tidal channels may continue to approximately equal export from edge erosion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the result of inland erosion and riverine transport (Spalding et al, 2010;Miao et al, 2011;Siikamäki et al, 2012;Miao et al, 2015;Kong et al, 2015). C b would therefore be buried in saltmarshes within living aboveground and belowground biomass over annual to decadal timescales (Theuerkauf et al, 2015). Sources of biogenic C in salt marshes include grasses, benthic algae, and bacteria (Leonard and Luther, 1995).…”
Section: B Sequestration Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The riverine transport of C (as well as phytoplankton and microphytobenthos) to estuaries are potential allogenic sources of C b into saltmarshes (Ghebrehiwet et al, 2009;Yang et al, 2015). In addition, saltmarshes can trap allogenic C from the water column (Theuerkauf et al, 2015).…”
Section: B Sequestration Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%