2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
136
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
21
136
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results contradict the findings of an earlier study by Ghosh [34] in terms of acknowledging the possibility of long run income elasticity of CO2 emissions, which was covertly mentioned by Ahmad et al [35]. However, limitations of both these studies were that these studies did not consider the influence of renewable energy aspects within their energygrowth-emission framework.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results contradict the findings of an earlier study by Ghosh [34] in terms of acknowledging the possibility of long run income elasticity of CO2 emissions, which was covertly mentioned by Ahmad et al [35]. However, limitations of both these studies were that these studies did not consider the influence of renewable energy aspects within their energygrowth-emission framework.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This signifies the negative environmental consequences of economic growth and energy consumption will surpass the environmental benefits of renewable energy generation. Therefore, in order to obtain the benefits of renewable energy generation, a threshold level of income must be achieved, which was indicated by Ghosh [34] and Ahmad et al [35]. When this segment of result is coupled with the elasticity of income, then the arguments are further validated.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly one-way causality in the longterm from energy consumption to economic growth was found. Ahmad et al (2016) …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutrality hypothesis (Growth >< Energy) - Masih and Masih (1996) (1955-1990 -Asaf-Adjaye (2000) (1973) -Fatai et al (2004) (1960-1999) -Gupta and Sahu (2009) (1960) -Mallick (2009) (1970-2005, for coal) - Ghosh and Kanjilal (2014) (1971) -Yang and Zhao (2014) (1970 - Cheng (1999) (1952) -Ghosh (2002) (1950-1997) -Mallick (2009) (1970-2005, for oil and electricity) - Shahbaz et al (2016Shahbaz et al ( ) (1971Shahbaz et al ( -2012 - Paul and Bhattacharya (2004) (1950-1996 - Abbas and Choudhury (2013) (1972, agricultural sector) - Ahmad et al (2016Ahmad et al ( ) (1971Ahmad et al ( -2014 - Asghar (2008Asghar ( ) (1971Asghar ( -2003 - Alam et al (2011) (1971-2006) (1971 These different results may be explained by the methods used (e.g., autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) ...…”
Section: Feedback Hypothesis (Growth ↔ Energy)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…showed a neutral effect between energy consumption and economic growth in India over the 1971-2011 period. Ahmad et al (2016) found a feedback relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in India over the 1971-2014 period. Shahbaz et al (2016) showed that economic growth and energy consumption were complementary, i.e., a feedback effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%