2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dots as inhibitors of virus by activation of type I interferon response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
117
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, due to their unique properties and biocompatibility, especially non‐toxic metabolism, carbon nanomaterials including CDs,9,10,14,77 nanographene sheets,43,78 graphene quantum dots,13 have been extensively investigated and proved to have outstanding antiviral effects. They are prepared by polyglycerol, 4‐aminophenylboronic acid hydrochloride, benzoxazine, PEG‐diamine, 3‐ethoxypropylamine, curcumin, and other raw materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, due to their unique properties and biocompatibility, especially non‐toxic metabolism, carbon nanomaterials including CDs,9,10,14,77 nanographene sheets,43,78 graphene quantum dots,13 have been extensively investigated and proved to have outstanding antiviral effects. They are prepared by polyglycerol, 4‐aminophenylboronic acid hydrochloride, benzoxazine, PEG‐diamine, 3‐ethoxypropylamine, curcumin, and other raw materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Gly‐CDs appear to exhibit stronger antiviral activity against RNA viruses (PRRSV and PEDV in this study) than DNA viruses (PRV in this study). Previous studies demonstrated that CDs can induce the production of IFN and IFN‐stimulating genes 10. However, viruses vary in their susceptibility to interferon, implying the Gly‐CDs may also vary in antiviral activity against different viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, a different range of concentrations (50 and 250 × 10 −6 m for His‐Au NCs and MES‐Au NCs) was used as reported in previous literature . The toxicity of His‐Au NCs and MES‐Au NCs on Porcine kidney (PK‐15) cells was evaluated by 3‐(4,5‐dimethyl‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay as described previously . In Figure a, His‐Au NCs showed little or no effect on the activity of PK‐15 cells in the concentration range of 25–150 × 10 −6 m and the viability of the cells was more than 95% at 50 × 10 −6 m , which was therefore utilized to explore the effect of His‐Au NCs on virus proliferation in the subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytotoxicity Assay : In order to assess the cytotoxicity of His‐Au NCs and MES‐Au NCs on PK‐15 cells, MTT assay was performed as described previously . Initially, PK‐15 cells at 90% confluence were treated with the mixture solution (100 µL) of different concentrations of His‐Au NCs (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 × 10 −6 m ) or MES‐Au NCs (0, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 × 10 −6 m ) and DMEM containing 2% FBS at a 96‐well plate for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO 2 atmosphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation