2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dioxide upcycling into industrially produced concrete blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example of active chemical intervention is the use of carbon dioxide for the accelerated curing of cementitious materials, often in combination with the application of a higher temperature. This active chemical intervention has already been reported by Klemm and Berger [ 16 ], but has been given renewed attention in recent years because of environmental issues, as illustrated by Monkman and MacDonald [ 17 ], studying the addition of carbon dioxide gas during mixing of the concrete for the production of blocks, and by Nielsen et al [ 18 ], studying carbonate-bonded construction materials from alkaline residues.…”
Section: Current Practices With Active Intervention To Control Concrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of active chemical intervention is the use of carbon dioxide for the accelerated curing of cementitious materials, often in combination with the application of a higher temperature. This active chemical intervention has already been reported by Klemm and Berger [ 16 ], but has been given renewed attention in recent years because of environmental issues, as illustrated by Monkman and MacDonald [ 17 ], studying the addition of carbon dioxide gas during mixing of the concrete for the production of blocks, and by Nielsen et al [ 18 ], studying carbonate-bonded construction materials from alkaline residues.…”
Section: Current Practices With Active Intervention To Control Concrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of cement production is highly energy-demanding with accompanying high environmental impact. Global cement production is the third-largest source of anthropogenic emissions of CO 2 after fossil fuels and land-use change [3] with approximate 5 -8 % estimation of the total CO 2 emissions [4][5][6][7]. Taking into consideration that global cement production has increased more than 30 times since 1950, estimated global emissions of CO 2 were 1.5 ± 0.12 Gt in 2018, cumulative global emissions were of 38.3 ± 2.4 Gt CO 2 between 1928 and 2018, 71% of which have occurred since 1990 [3], it exists a legitimate demand on the use of alternative binders with significantly decreased influence on the environment or the use of recycled cementitious materials utilized in new concrete mixes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another area of active research includes so-called 'CO 2 utilization' in concrete where concrete is formulated with added CO 2 either in its constituents before casting, during batching and mixing, or in finished products. Three main CO 2 utilization strategies in concrete formulation can be found in the literature as shown in figure 1, including carbonation curing [35][36][37], carbonation during mixing [38][39][40][41], and carbonation with recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) [42]. Thus far, the majority of studies on CO 2 utilization in concrete exclusively explored mitigation opportunities through sequestration using carbonation curing [8,[43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%