Abstract:The present series indicates that selected recurrences after primary RT for T1 and T2 glottic carcinoma are eligible for endoscopic salvage surgery with oncologic results comparable to those with open neck procedures but with a lower complication rate and a favorable functional outcome.
“…[1][2][3] Local recurrence rate after radiation therapy (RT) ranges from 5% to 13% for T1 and from 25% to 30% for T2 laryngeal cancer. 4,5 Surgical management of recurrences after RT failure encompasses endoscopic laser excision, [6][7][8] partial laryngectomies through an open-neck approach, 4,[9][10][11][12][13] and total laryngectomy, which still remains the most widely used procedure in such a scenario.…”
SCPLs represent effective surgical organ-preservation strategies in the treatment of selected recurrences after RT failure, resulting in a good local control as well as functional recovery with acceptable morbidity, despite a complication rate which is not negligible.
“…[1][2][3] Local recurrence rate after radiation therapy (RT) ranges from 5% to 13% for T1 and from 25% to 30% for T2 laryngeal cancer. 4,5 Surgical management of recurrences after RT failure encompasses endoscopic laser excision, [6][7][8] partial laryngectomies through an open-neck approach, 4,[9][10][11][12][13] and total laryngectomy, which still remains the most widely used procedure in such a scenario.…”
SCPLs represent effective surgical organ-preservation strategies in the treatment of selected recurrences after RT failure, resulting in a good local control as well as functional recovery with acceptable morbidity, despite a complication rate which is not negligible.
“…The series of Puxeddu et al [15] is a two-center retrospective case series, with results of one included center updated in a later publication by Piazza et al [16], which, in turn, was updated by Del Bon et al [17]. Most authors reported on series of rT1 to rT2 glottic cancer, while some authors also included more advanced glottic cases (rT3 or even rT4) [11••, 18–21] or supraglottic recurrences [14, 18, 20–22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors noticed higher rates of the development of a second recurrence following salvage TLM in patients with AC involvement when compared to patients with the AC free of tumor: second recurrence rates of 50 versus 11% [18], 71 versus 48% [23], 67 versus 8% [15], and 55 versus 29% [24], respectively, were reported. On univariate analysis, Han et al identified AC involvement as a negative prognostic factor for 3-and 5-year local control rates (51.9 versus 85.7% and 0 versus 64.2%, p = 0.09) [24].…”
Purpose of ReviewThe aim of this report is to identify relevant literature reports on salvage transoral laser microsurgery (TLM); to consider its oncologic and functional outcomes, as well as reported complications; and to address indications and limitations of salvage TLM.FindingsThe weighted average of local control after first salvage TLM was 57%. Repeated TLM procedures for second or third recurrences were required in up to 41% of cases, resulting in a weighted average of local control with TLM alone of 67%. The rate of definite laryngeal preservation was 73%. The ultimate local control rate, including cases that required total laryngectomy, was 90%. The overall complication rate after salvage TLM was 14%.SummarySalvage TLM of radiorecurrent laryngeal cancer yields excellent oncologic outcomes. Serious complications are scarce, hospitalization times are short, and functional outcomes in terms of voice and swallowing are favorable when compared to open conservation laryngeal surgery. The key to success is an optimal patient selection.
“…1,4 This subsequently makes the cricothyroid membrane and anterior commissure ligament more susceptible to direct extension of tumor.…”
Section: Anatomic Point #1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mainstay surgical treatment option for most early lesions is typically via a transoral approach, with shorter hospitalizations, lower morbidity, and improved functional results. 1 However, this review will focus on transcervical approaches and discuss their seminal anatomic principles. Open approaches can be considered in situations where exposure is inadequate for transoral resection, or the transoral technique is not in the purview of the institution, as well as for salvage surgery after radiation failure.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.