2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.548-549.1876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) Foam Stability Dependence on Nanoparticle Concentration for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

Abstract: Foam flooding is an established approach in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) to recover a significant quantity of the residual oil left in the reservoir after primary and secondary recovery. However, foam flooding faces various problems due to low viscosity effect, which reduces its efficiency in recovering oil. Using surfactant to stabilize CO2foam may reduce mobility and improve areal and vertical sweep efficiency, but the potential weaknesses are such that high surfactant retention in porous media and unstable f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the addition of 0.5 wt% SNP at 0.5 wt% AOS, decreased the stability of the foam. Mohd et al [18] have found the most stable foam achieved at 0.4 wt% nanoparticle, slightly higher than this finding possibly due to combination effect with surfactant as foaming agent during the investigation. While [22] claimed that stable CO2 foam could only be generated at SNP concentrations ranging from 0.3 wt% to 0.5 wt% at 1000ppm AOS concentration for 15nm SNP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the addition of 0.5 wt% SNP at 0.5 wt% AOS, decreased the stability of the foam. Mohd et al [18] have found the most stable foam achieved at 0.4 wt% nanoparticle, slightly higher than this finding possibly due to combination effect with surfactant as foaming agent during the investigation. While [22] claimed that stable CO2 foam could only be generated at SNP concentrations ranging from 0.3 wt% to 0.5 wt% at 1000ppm AOS concentration for 15nm SNP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Higher SNP concentrations lead to more stable foam due to attachment of more particles spreading along the foam film interface [38]. However, the foam generated was unstable when excessive SNP concentration exceeded its optimum concentration used at 0.5 wt% based on the experimental condition [18,39]. The increase of SNP concentrations has led the accumulation of particles at the interface, resulting in particles aggregation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years considerable research efforts have also been devoted to develop CO 2 foams for EOR and hydraulic fracturing applications [14][15][16][17][18]. CO 2 foam flooding has all the advantages of CO 2 flooding and in addition the low viscosity problem is mostly solved as the stable CO 2 foams have few orders of magnitude higher viscosities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohd et al (2015) have investigated the mobility of nanoparticlestabilized CO 2 foam, who found reduction of mobility resulting in enhancing oil recovery [10]. Foam stability also increased with increasing nanoparticle concentration [11]. Zirconium oxide based nanofluids have been applied for wettability alteration, which have great potentials in changing oil-wet limestone towards strongly water-wet condition [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%