2015
DOI: 10.3390/f6093304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Dioxide and Methane Formation in Norway Spruce Stems Infected by White-Rot Fungi

Abstract: Globally, billions of tons of carbon sequestered in trees are annually recycled back to the atmosphere through wood decomposition by microbes. In Norway, every fifth Norway spruce shows at final harvest infection by pathogenic white-rot fungi in the genera Heterobasidion and Armillaria. As these fungi can mineralize all components of wood, we predicted that they have a significant carbon footprint. Gas samples taken from infected stems were analyzed for CO2 and CH4 concentrations, and wood samples from differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In nature, trees are widely infected by fungi and bacteria. It has been shown that the precursors for the production of CH 4 are finally produced through degradation of wood by these microorganisms (Covey et al, 2012;Hietala et al, 2015;Zeikus & Ward, 1974). If wood degradation does not occur in visibly healthy wet heartwood under anoxic conditions, CH 4 may be produced in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 10.1002/2017JG003991 wet heartwood, presumably using the substrate of external substances transported to the heartwood by the phloem and/or cambium.…”
Section: The Ch 4 Production May Be Explained Largely By Water Contenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nature, trees are widely infected by fungi and bacteria. It has been shown that the precursors for the production of CH 4 are finally produced through degradation of wood by these microorganisms (Covey et al, 2012;Hietala et al, 2015;Zeikus & Ward, 1974). If wood degradation does not occur in visibly healthy wet heartwood under anoxic conditions, CH 4 may be produced in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 10.1002/2017JG003991 wet heartwood, presumably using the substrate of external substances transported to the heartwood by the phloem and/or cambium.…”
Section: The Ch 4 Production May Be Explained Largely By Water Contenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the frequency of rot varies from stand to stand, and more than 50 % of the trees may be affected in extreme cases (E. Loe, Allskog AS, pers. comm., 2015;Hietala et al 2015). Then, 15 % of the value, or even more, is lost.…”
Section: Expected Response From Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stands are destabilized against wind throw which force earlier harvest with higher costs and lower benefits. The decay recycle the carbon sequestered in the stems back to the atmosphere (Hietala et al 2015), at the same time as the wood becomes less suitable in products that has higher substitution effects when used instead of concrete and steel in constructions. In addition, it is expected that climate change causes a Heterobasidion ssp.…”
Section: Expected Response From Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In complex ecosystems such as forests, the measurement of the carbon content in the root biomass or the amount of CO 2 released via respiration and organic matter decay in the soil is methodologically extremely difficult (Cairns et al, 1997;Rykowski, 2000;Janssens et al, 2001), irrespective of whether the values were estimated or indirectly interpolated (Newell & Fallon, 1991;Chen et al, 2000;Kueppers et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decay of cellulose bonds leads to the release of D-glucose, which is further oxygenated to water and carbon dioxide, generating substantial amounts of energy (Schwarze et al, 2000;Chapin et al, 2002;Hammel et al, 2002). Carbon dioxide release as a result of tree death and subsequent wood decay significantly contributes to increased CO 2 concentrations in the atmosphere (Kirschbaum, 2000;Watkinson et al, 2006;Hietala et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%