1992
DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(92)90112-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon deposition over Fe, Ni, and Co foils from CO-H2-CH4-CO2-H2O, CO-CO2, CH4-H2, and CO-H2-H2O gas mixtures: II. Kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of deposition on these foils is comparable. It is known that Fe and Co are also catalytically active toward carbon deposition during the thermal stressing of hydrocarbons. , Chambers et al studied the cobalt−copper binary system and observed that increasing the Co content decreases the carbon deposition during ethylene thermal stressing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of deposition on these foils is comparable. It is known that Fe and Co are also catalytically active toward carbon deposition during the thermal stressing of hydrocarbons. , Chambers et al studied the cobalt−copper binary system and observed that increasing the Co content decreases the carbon deposition during ethylene thermal stressing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon formation rates depend linearly on the carbon activity ( a C ) for these equilibrated mixtures, , consistent with a diffusion-limited filament growth mechanism. A few studies have addressed the formation rates and morphology of carbon filaments during CO–H 2 –H 2 O–CO 2 –CH 4 reactions , but without accurate mechanism-based frameworks, which are required to relate the prevalent carbon activity at catalytic surfaces to the dynamics of filament formation under different reaction conditions. The information available about the effects of Ni crystallite size on growth rates and morphology of carbon deposits remains largely anecdotal. , Moreover, the effects of H 2 on carbon deposition rates remain contradictory, with some studies , reporting that H 2 increases carbon formation rates and others , demonstrating the opposite trend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have addressed the formation rates and morphology of carbon filaments during CO–H 2 –H 2 O–CO 2 –CH 4 reactions , but without accurate mechanism-based frameworks, which are required to relate the prevalent carbon activity at catalytic surfaces to the dynamics of filament formation under different reaction conditions. The information available about the effects of Ni crystallite size on growth rates and morphology of carbon deposits remains largely anecdotal. , Moreover, the effects of H 2 on carbon deposition rates remain contradictory, with some studies , reporting that H 2 increases carbon formation rates and others , demonstrating the opposite trend. The effect of H 2 on the thermodynamic carbon activity prevalent during reactions of CO–H 2 –H 2 O–CO 2 –CH 4 mixtures remains largely unexplored at this time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different metals commonly used in CNF and H 2 production, Ni-based supported catalysts are of special interest because they show good activity at relatively moderate temperatures [18,[22][23][24][25][26]. Indeed, the decomposition temperature of methane (870-970 K) with these catalysts is about 300 K lower than that with Fe-based catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%