“…However, these values of sensitivity to temperature correspond to the cold‐adapted communities and enzymes of Arctic seawater, and they are expected to be higher than those of temperate waters since cold‐adapted enzymes tend to be more responsive to increasing temperature than warm‐adapted enzymes (German, Marcelo, Stone, & Allison, ). Additional information about the sensitivity to temperature of βG activity is available from studies of terrestrial systems ( E a ranging 0.27–0.72 eV, (Trasar‐Cepeda, Gil‐Sotres, & Leirós, ; Wallenstein, Mcmahon, & Schimel, ; German et al., ; Stone et al., ; Steinweg, Jagadanna, Frerichs, & Mayes, ; Koyama, Wallenstein, Simpson, & Moore, ; Bárta, Šlajsová, Tahovská, Picek, & Šantrůčková, )) while much fewer data are available for LAP ( E a ranging −0.33 to 0.62 eV, (Wallenstein et al., ; Koyama et al., ; Bárta et al., )) or AP ( E a ranging 0.39–0.48 eV, (Bárta et al., )). Maybe the striking lack of data for marine systems arises from the general consideration of the temperature as a sparse driver of the extracellular enzyme activity when characterizing the carbon and nutrient cycling in the marine environments (Arnosti et al., ) while being considered as fundamental driver in terrestrial systems.…”