2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon concentration variations in the roots, stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
165
4
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(51 reference statements)
24
165
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An intensive study of carbon concentration in Pinus pinaster confirmed the relevance of a sampling design that split the stem into homogeneous tissues (Bert and Danjon, 2006). Indeed, based on the knowledge of the concentration of one element at the tissue scale, such an approach enables the average concentration of the stem to be determined.…”
Section: Tree Sampling For Nutrient Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An intensive study of carbon concentration in Pinus pinaster confirmed the relevance of a sampling design that split the stem into homogeneous tissues (Bert and Danjon, 2006). Indeed, based on the knowledge of the concentration of one element at the tissue scale, such an approach enables the average concentration of the stem to be determined.…”
Section: Tree Sampling For Nutrient Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The set was taken from unpublished data from a previous study (Bert and Danjon, 2006). Briefly, the dataset included 198 measurements of nitrogen concentration in 12 Pinus pinaster trees growing in a 50-year-old stand (BILOS stand; B50 sampling; Tab.…”
Section: Statistical Analyses and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different plant species may have a specific chemical composition and carbon compounds due to their metabolism, as physiology and morphology are linked to an optimal functioning under the ecological conditions where they have evolved (Sardans & Peñuelas 2014). Within a given individual, C concentration varies between tissues (Yeboah et al 2014), depending to a larger extent on the chemistry of such tissues (Savidge 2003) than on plant age or size (Bert & Danjon 2006). This study presents C concentration values for 175 plant species in 18 families from temperate, tropical, subtropical, arid and semiarid zones in Mexico to establish whether and how biomass C concentration differed across environments, taxa and plant tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Similarly, carbon concentration in black pine seedlings was a poor indicator of fertilizer response (Jeong et al, 2010) because the inter-and intra-specific variations of carbon concentration in tree species were determined by genetic and environmental factors (Bert and Danjon, 2006;Zhang et al, 2009). In contrast to this result, carbon concentration of tree components was generally greater in nutrient deficient conditions compared with trees grown in better nutrient conditions because of low mineral concentration of tree components or the difference of carbon allocation (Poorter and De Jong, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%