2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon budget of a rainfed spring maize cropland with straw returning on the Loess Plateau, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
30
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…response of terrestrial ecosystems to changing climatic and environmental conditions (Heimann and Reichstein, 2008). Nevertheless, the most recent efforts of evaluating the detailed CO2 budget components only appeared in limited studies for forests (Iglesias et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2013) and agro-ecosystems (Moureaux et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2015;Demyan et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…response of terrestrial ecosystems to changing climatic and environmental conditions (Heimann and Reichstein, 2008). Nevertheless, the most recent efforts of evaluating the detailed CO2 budget components only appeared in limited studies for forests (Iglesias et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2013) and agro-ecosystems (Moureaux et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2015;Demyan et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kutsch et al, 2010). Only a few studies reported the detailed CO2 budget components (Moureaux et al, 2008;Aubinet et al, 2009;Jans et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2015;Demyan et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2017), but the results remain diverse regarding whether agro-ecosystems are carbon sinks or sources. Therefore, the CO2 budget evaluation remains necessary to understand the contribution of agro-ecosystems to the global carbon balance (Smith et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Discussions 4.1 Partitioning the NEP into the difference between GEP and RE NEP is the difference between GEP and RE, and the two processes with different physical and biological controls are linked over long timescales at the ecosystem level [9][10][11][12][13]. Partitioning of NEP into GEP and RE is needed for better understanding the causes of IAV of NEP [10].…”
Section: The Iav Of Nep and Its Climatic And Biotic Direct Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GEP, as a direct indicator of carbon uptake during ecosystem photosynthesis, is controlled by canopy development, nutrient status, and light, temperature and water conditions [2,3,25,48]. RE, as a direct indicator of carbon loss during ecosystem respiration, is controlled by temperature, soil moisture, nutrient availability, stocks of living and dead biomass, and ecosystem productivity [11,26,49]. It is necessary to explore the causes of variation in GEP and RE rather than directly correlate NEP with meteorological or abiotic drivers [13,26,50].…”
Section: The Iav Of Nep and Its Climatic And Biotic Direct Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation