1998
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/12/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon beam dosimetry intercomparison at HIMAC

Abstract: To verify international uniformity in carbon beam dosimetry, an intercomparison programme was carried out at the heavy ion medical accelerator (HIMAC). Dose measurements with ionization chambers were performed for both unmodulated and 6 cm modulated 290 MeV/nucleon carbon beams. Although two different dosimetry procedures were employed, the evaluated values of absorbed dose were in good agreement. This comparison established a common framework for ionization chamber dosimetry between two different carbon beam … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the detection efficiency of FNTDs being close to 100 % [6] we found a detection efficiency of about 99 % for the PNTDs for these conditions. The data presented here do thus not support the findings of Fukumura et al [3], namely that the accuracy of PNTDs in the entrance channel of a clinical carbon beam is hampered by incomplete detection of low-LET particles such as fragments. These would have been registered by the FNTDs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…With the detection efficiency of FNTDs being close to 100 % [6] we found a detection efficiency of about 99 % for the PNTDs for these conditions. The data presented here do thus not support the findings of Fukumura et al [3], namely that the accuracy of PNTDs in the entrance channel of a clinical carbon beam is hampered by incomplete detection of low-LET particles such as fragments. These would have been registered by the FNTDs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical doses used in both institutions are expressed as gray equivalent. Physical comparison between the two facilities has been done for dose but not for LET distribution yet (9). If biological effectiveness of carbon-ion beams were different between the two facilities, we would have difficulty interpreting clinical results based on clinical dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details concerning the beam characteristics, biological irradiation procedures and C-ion beam dosimetry have been previously described (29, 30). The experimental dose distributions were measured at the middle of a 6 cm SOBP of C ions, and the energy spread and the dose-average LET values were approximately 0–160 MeV and 50 keV/μm, respectively (7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%