2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon-based active support for water oxidation electrocatalyst: Making full use of the available surface area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,[7][8][9] Commercial noble metal-based catalysts, such as IrO 2 and RuO 2 , can effectively reduce the OER overpotential to accelerate the reaction rate, but the scarcity, high price, and poor stability of noble metals restrict their applications in practice. 2,[10][11][12] Therefore, it is essential to seek non-precious metal OER catalysts with low cost and high activity to develop water splitting technology. 5,[13][14][15] Transition metal-based materials, especially metal oxides or hydroxides based on Ni, Fe, Co, Cu, Mn, etc., owing to their abundance, low price, and eco-friendliness as well as good electrocatalytic activity and stability, have become widely studied OER electrocatalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[7][8][9] Commercial noble metal-based catalysts, such as IrO 2 and RuO 2 , can effectively reduce the OER overpotential to accelerate the reaction rate, but the scarcity, high price, and poor stability of noble metals restrict their applications in practice. 2,[10][11][12] Therefore, it is essential to seek non-precious metal OER catalysts with low cost and high activity to develop water splitting technology. 5,[13][14][15] Transition metal-based materials, especially metal oxides or hydroxides based on Ni, Fe, Co, Cu, Mn, etc., owing to their abundance, low price, and eco-friendliness as well as good electrocatalytic activity and stability, have become widely studied OER electrocatalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalytic OER kinetics of electrocatalysts was studied by using the corresponding Tafel plot by fitting the data into the Tafel equation: η = b log j + a , where η is the overpotential, b is the Tafel slope, and j is the current density [18,20] . As shown in Figure 4c, the Tafel slope of NiFeAl‐NW/NF‐S is 49.91 mV ⋅ dec −1, which is smaller than that of NiFe‐NS/NF (55.16 mV ⋅ dec −1 ), NiFeAl‐NW/NF (56.05 mV ⋅ dec −1 ), Al‐NS/NF (53.94 mV ⋅ dec −1 ), NF (68.41 mV ⋅ dec −1 ) and even commercial RuO 2 (62.97 mV ⋅ dec −1 , Figure 4i) and IrO 2 (59.35 mV ⋅ dec −1 ), indicating that NiFeAl‐NW/NF‐S is more favorable for OER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrocatalytic activity of the catalyst is usually proportional to its electrochemical effective surface area (ECSA), while ECSA is linearly related to the double‐layer capacitance (C dl ) [20,30] . What's more, C dl is also usually used to quantitate the effective active surface areas of catalysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 38,39 ] Furthermore, the electrochemically active surface areas (ECSA) of the samples were also tested according to the double‐layer capacitance ( C dl ) method. [ 40 ] As displayed in Figure S14 (Supporting Information), NOMC exhibited a 3.2 times higher ECSA value than that of NC. The CO current densities ( j co ) of NOMC and NC were further normalized by the ECSA as shown in Figure S15 (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%