2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111910
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon and energy cost impacts of electrification of space heating with heat pumps in the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the programs reviewed do not include singlemeasure upgrades, such as the rebating of heat pump installation, for which there are numerous programs across the US (see recent heating electrification review by Cohn and Esram [10]). Overall, savings fall in the range of 30-40% for whole-home upgrades, which exceed those commonly reported for low-income weatherization, but they are not as substantial as those documented by Less and Walker [2,11] for extensive deep energy retrofits. Project costs reported by these programs ranged from USD 10,000 to USD 20,000 in most instances, but more ambitious programs with higher average savings reported costs as high as USD 50,000 per home.…”
Section: Energy Upgrade Trends and Programs In The Uscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Notably, the programs reviewed do not include singlemeasure upgrades, such as the rebating of heat pump installation, for which there are numerous programs across the US (see recent heating electrification review by Cohn and Esram [10]). Overall, savings fall in the range of 30-40% for whole-home upgrades, which exceed those commonly reported for low-income weatherization, but they are not as substantial as those documented by Less and Walker [2,11] for extensive deep energy retrofits. Project costs reported by these programs ranged from USD 10,000 to USD 20,000 in most instances, but more ambitious programs with higher average savings reported costs as high as USD 50,000 per home.…”
Section: Energy Upgrade Trends and Programs In The Uscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…This is based on prices and HP performance in Iowa, but as shown in Section 1, is broadly applicable for the Midwestern US. A recent state‐specific assessment has been reported by Walker et al 16 The breakeven sCOP, which can be calculated solely from natural gas prices, natural gas furnace efficiency, and electricity prices is a simple metric that can be used to compare available HP performance to the performance required for operational cost break‐even. Our analysis shows that the sCOP required for a HP to breakeven with a high efficiency NG furnace in Iowa has increased from 2.3 (in 2007) to 4.5 (in 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our focus is on the difference in operation between state‐of‐the‐art systems and a majority of modern high efficiency NG furnaces operate with 95% AFUE. Walker et al 16 specifically report sensitivity to furnace AFUE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar analysis for the U.S. disaggregated energy consumption by census tract to estimate how an increase in heat pump adoption would impact peak electricity demand, using three different U.S. Department of Energy heat pump performance targets that vary with temperature (Waite and Modi 2020). Others have used breakeven analysis to identify a fixed COP at which heat pumps would reduce each U.S. state's emissions or energy costs, explicitly ignoring how heat pump performance varies with temperature due to differences between heat pump models (Walker et al 2022). In each case, there was relatively little differentiation or specification of the type of air source heat pump chosen, which can have significant impacts on overall electricity consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%