“…This trend is unexpected, as one would expect the carbonyl stretching frequencies for the complexes containing weaker π-acceptor ligands (AsPh 3 ) to have lower values compared to their phosphine analogues. This observation, however, was also reported for [EPh 3 (CO) 5 W] (E = P, As) [32] and cis-[EPh 3 (CO) 4 WC(OMe)(Me)] (E = P, As) [3], see Table 2. Results in Table 2 show that the Rgroups and identity of E in ER 3 (E = P, As; R = alkyl, aryl or OPh) does not have a significant influence on the position of the A …”