1984
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1270220206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon‐13 NMR of quinone methides

Abstract: The IuC NMR spectra of four ortho-and seven paraquinone methides were assigned using chemical shift and long-range carbon-proton coupling information. The carbonyl shifts are compared with those in ortho-and para-benzoquinones. The chemical shifts of the carbonyls of the pquinone methides are observed at 6 186.2-186.4 for the three ortho-di-tert-butyl-substituted compounds and at 6 180.7-181.5 for the four ortho-oxy-substituted compounds. In the three o-quinone methides with mettqmra-dioxy substituents, the ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3H NMR (CDCI3) 6 1.72 (m, 4 H, 2 x CH2), 2.60 (m, 4 H, 2 x benzyl CH2), 5.15 (s, 2H, 2 x OH), 6.55 (s, 2H, 2 x ArH); UV (CH3CN) 210, 226, 288 nm; GC-MS, El m/z 164 (75) (M). 4-Cinnamylcatechol (3) was synthesized by condensing catechol with cinnamic alcohol as described previously (10). *H NMR (CDC13) d 3.44 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 6.38 (m, 1H, vinyl CH), 6.77 (m, 1H, vinyl CH), 7.2-7.4 (m, 8H, ArH); UV (CH3OH) 206, 252, 284 nm; GC-MS, El m/z 226 (100) (M).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3H NMR (CDCI3) 6 1.72 (m, 4 H, 2 x CH2), 2.60 (m, 4 H, 2 x benzyl CH2), 5.15 (s, 2H, 2 x OH), 6.55 (s, 2H, 2 x ArH); UV (CH3CN) 210, 226, 288 nm; GC-MS, El m/z 164 (75) (M). 4-Cinnamylcatechol (3) was synthesized by condensing catechol with cinnamic alcohol as described previously (10). *H NMR (CDC13) d 3.44 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 6.38 (m, 1H, vinyl CH), 6.77 (m, 1H, vinyl CH), 7.2-7.4 (m, 8H, ArH); UV (CH3OH) 206, 252, 284 nm; GC-MS, El m/z 226 (100) (M).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comparison, the C═O chemical shift of o-quinone methides is~186 ppm. [17] Considering that the chemical shift of ohydroxyacetophenone is 204.5 ppm, [18] whereas that of o-hydroxythioacetophenone is 235 ppm, [6] an estimate of the C═S chemical shift of the B form of 221 ppm can be made. The observed value of~166 ppm suggests that the A form dominates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C‐1 (C═S) chemical shift is unusually low (~166 ppm). For a comparison, the C═O chemical shift of o‐quinone methides is ~186 ppm . Considering that the chemical shift of o ‐hydroxyacetophenone is 204.5 ppm, whereas that of o ‐hydroxythioacetophenone is 235 ppm, an estimate of the C═S chemical shift of the B form of 221 ppm can be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%