1984
DOI: 10.1021/ma00140a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon-13 NMR chemical shifts and the microstructure of propylene-vinyl chloride copolymers with low propylene content

Abstract: 13C NMR chemical shifts expected for the carbon atoms in propylene-vinyl chloride (P-VC) copolymers of low propylene content are calculated as a function of copolymer stereosequence. Mark's conformational model of P-VC copolymers is coupled with the -gauche effect, which results in upfield chemical shifts for those carbon atoms in a gauche arrangement with carbon or chlorine substituents in the position, to calculate the 13C NMR chemical shifts of the carbon atoms in the vicinity of a propylene unit surrounded… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major differences between the spectra of forms I and II are a 2–3 ppm upfield shift of the crystalline CH (from ∼68 to 66 ppm) and crystalline CH 2 adjacent to the methine (from ∼42 to 39 ppm). Following prior work, , the upfield shifts conform to a γ-gauche effect or shielding of CH and α CH 2 by the CH 2 that are gamma (or three bonds apart) to them. Shielding takes place only when the CH–C bond is in a gauche conformation. , As it is clear from the spectra of Figure that the βCH 2 (27.7 ppm) and other CH 2 further from the CH unit have equivalent resonances for forms I and II, the 13 C NMR spectra provide further evidence of the gauche conformation around the crystalline CH–Cl unit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The major differences between the spectra of forms I and II are a 2–3 ppm upfield shift of the crystalline CH (from ∼68 to 66 ppm) and crystalline CH 2 adjacent to the methine (from ∼42 to 39 ppm). Following prior work, , the upfield shifts conform to a γ-gauche effect or shielding of CH and α CH 2 by the CH 2 that are gamma (or three bonds apart) to them. Shielding takes place only when the CH–C bond is in a gauche conformation. , As it is clear from the spectra of Figure that the βCH 2 (27.7 ppm) and other CH 2 further from the CH unit have equivalent resonances for forms I and II, the 13 C NMR spectra provide further evidence of the gauche conformation around the crystalline CH–Cl unit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…14 The major differences between the spectra of forms I and II are a 2−3 ppm upfield shift of the crystalline CH (from ∼68 to 66 ppm) and crystalline CH 2 adjacent to the methine (from ∼42 to 39 ppm). Following prior work, 33,34 the upfield shifts conform to a γ-gauche effect or shielding of CH and α CH 2 by the CH 2 that are gamma (or three bonds apart) to them. Shielding takes place only when the CH−C bond is in a gauche conformation.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These shifts were first estimated following the work of Tonelli et al 29 According to this work, shielding of a CH by a substituent that is in a carbon three bonds apart (γ position) from the observed carbon results in an upfield shift of ∼-2.5 ppm only when the CH-C bond is in a gauche conformation. In addition, the R-CH 2 vicinal and in a gauche conformation to the substituted carbon presents a similar upfield chemical shift.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative configuration of the decalin ring in 5 was the same as 12 , inferred from the chemical shifts of C-1 to C-10 and NOESY correlations of H-1/H-7, H 3 -20/H-6, and NH/H-1. A significant difference between 5 and 12 was found in the chemical shift of C-12 ( δ C 31.0 in 5 instead of δ C 38.2 in 12 ), which was caused by the γ-gauche effect [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ], indicating an axial orientation of Cl–14. The relative configurations of C-7 and C-11 in 5 were determined as S * and R *, respectively, from NOESY correlations of H 3 -18/H-6, H 3 -18/H-8b, and H-8a/H-12, as shown in the Newman projection ( Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%