1982
DOI: 10.1021/om00067a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon-13 and silicon-29 chemical shifts and coupling constants involving tris(trimethylsilyl)silyl systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
5
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] The 1 J SiÀC value of 1 is also almost the same as the 84 Hz reported for (Me 3 Si) 2 SiC(Ad)OSiMe 3 (Ad 1-adamantyl), [13] with a SiÀC bond length of 1.764 . [14] These results indicate the delocalized character of 1, which is supported by the calculated structure of a model compound 2.…”
Section: Synthesis and Properties Of An Overcrowdedsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…[5] The 1 J SiÀC value of 1 is also almost the same as the 84 Hz reported for (Me 3 Si) 2 SiC(Ad)OSiMe 3 (Ad 1-adamantyl), [13] with a SiÀC bond length of 1.764 . [14] These results indicate the delocalized character of 1, which is supported by the calculated structure of a model compound 2.…”
Section: Synthesis and Properties Of An Overcrowdedsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Consistent with this explanation is the remarkably low-field chemical shift found for the sp 2 hybridized C atom and the relatively high-field position found for the 298i absorption of the sp 2 hybridized Si atom (Brook, Abdesaken, Gutekunst & Plavac, 1982). The crystal structure is normal in other respects, all bond lengths and angles lying within accepted ranges.…”
Section: Si(l)supporting
confidence: 52%
“…[41] The small 1 J Si,C values are known to indicate long SiÀC bond lengths and/or the small s character of the SiÀC bond, both of which lead to weak SiÀC bonds. Therefore, these results strongly suggest that the SiÀC bonds of the SiCN units are considerably weak and their strength decreases in the order 5 c > 5 d > 5 e with increasing bulkiness of the substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%