“…The gHMBCAD correlation C-2′ to H-1′′ helped to solve the rest of the structure, which was shown to be an α-D-glucopyranose ring after similar examination of the sugar ring, which is explained above.The α-D-glucopyranose ring carbon chemical shifts were δC 91.8 (C-1′′), 71.7 (C-2′′), 72.8 (C-3′′), 69.9(C-4′′), 72.9 (C-5′′) and 60.5 (C-6′′) and δH 5.19 (1H, d, J = 4.1 Hz, H-1′′), 3.20 (1H, dd, J = 9.7, 3.9 Hz, H-2′′), 3.49 (1H, t, J = 9.3 Hz, H-3′′), 3.14 (1H, t, J = 9.4 Hz, H-4′′), 3.65 (1H, ddd, J = 9.7, 4.7, 2.4 Hz, H-5′′), 3.52 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 4.8 Hz, H-6′′) and 3.50 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 2.6 Hz, H-6′′), respectively. The gCOSY correlations H-2′′/H-1′′, H-4′′/H-5′′ and H-4′′/H-3′′ supported by many 2D-TOCSY correlations that include H-1′′/H-3′′, H-1′′/H-2′′, H-4′′/H-5′′, H-2′′/H-5′′, H-4′′/H-6′′, H-2′′/H-3′′, H-4′′/H-2′′, H-5′′/H-2′′, H-2′′/H-4′′, H-5′′/H-4′′, H-3′′/H-4′′, H-6′′/H-5′′, H-6′′/H-4′′, H-4′′/H-1′′, H-2′′/H-1′′, H-5′′/H-1′′ and gHMBCAD correlations C-5′′to H-1′′, C-4′′ to H-3′′, C-5′′ to H-4′′, C-2′′ to H-3′′ and C-6′′ to H-4′′ provided proof of structure for the α-D-glucopyranose ring moiety in compound(1). The absence of correlations in the 1 H-1 H ROESY data, indirectly confirms the disposition of the protons in both the β-D-fructofuranose and α-Dglucopyranose rings.…”