2015
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n5p399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Características morfológicas e desempenho de crescimento de monossexo macho de tilápia da variedade GIFT e Saint Peter®

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the morphological traits and growth performance of monosex populations of the Genetic Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT) and Saint Peter ® of male tilapias reared in a mixed system. The experiment was carried out from June 2012 to November 2012 in Sgarbi fish farm, Palotina, Paraná State, Brazil. GIFT juveniles were obtained from the State University of Maringá (UEM/Codapar) fish farm broodstock, and the red hybrids were from the Sgarbi fish farm broodstock. The average genetic values o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2015), who obtained 338.28 g over a period of 160 days of cultivation of the GIFT variety. The observed difference in weight between the studies with Nile tilapia is due to genetics -varieties (Marengoni et al, 2015), environment (Oliveira et al, 2017) and density and/or production system (Ribeiro, 2001). The greater weight found in families AA10 and AA16 at the fourth and fifth biometric assessments indicates the superiority of these families over the others, especially family AA8 at the fourth biometric assessment (37.2% lower than family AA10) and family AA6 at the fifth assessment (37.1% lower than family AA10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015), who obtained 338.28 g over a period of 160 days of cultivation of the GIFT variety. The observed difference in weight between the studies with Nile tilapia is due to genetics -varieties (Marengoni et al, 2015), environment (Oliveira et al, 2017) and density and/or production system (Ribeiro, 2001). The greater weight found in families AA10 and AA16 at the fourth and fifth biometric assessments indicates the superiority of these families over the others, especially family AA8 at the fourth biometric assessment (37.2% lower than family AA10) and family AA6 at the fifth assessment (37.1% lower than family AA10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%