2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-014-1121-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Características de la conductividad hidráulica en montañas e implicancias para conceptualizar el flujo del agua subterránea en el basamento

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
119
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
4
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The complex lithologies of the Coast Ranges (dominated by marine sedimentary and metasedimentary rocks) and Sierra (predominantly granite and other plutonic rocks) (Farrar and Bertoldi, 1988;Jennings et al, 1977) are assumed to have some non-zero permeability through a depth of 500 m, and that the hydraulic properties, where permeability is the result of fractures, can be adequately represented by a block effective parameter. This conceptualization of mountain block flow systems as a fractured (or otherwise permeable) mantle overlying relatively impermeable crystalline rock is consistent with recent approaches to hydrologic simulation in such systems (Manning and Solomon, 2005;Welch and Allen, 2014). We assume the mountain block transmits water internally through local and regional topographically driven subsurface flow paths and is con-nected to the aquifers of the Central Valley through mountain front recharge and diffuse mountain block recharge (Gleeson and Manning, 2008;Wilson and Guan, 2013).…”
Section: Conceptual Modelsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The complex lithologies of the Coast Ranges (dominated by marine sedimentary and metasedimentary rocks) and Sierra (predominantly granite and other plutonic rocks) (Farrar and Bertoldi, 1988;Jennings et al, 1977) are assumed to have some non-zero permeability through a depth of 500 m, and that the hydraulic properties, where permeability is the result of fractures, can be adequately represented by a block effective parameter. This conceptualization of mountain block flow systems as a fractured (or otherwise permeable) mantle overlying relatively impermeable crystalline rock is consistent with recent approaches to hydrologic simulation in such systems (Manning and Solomon, 2005;Welch and Allen, 2014). We assume the mountain block transmits water internally through local and regional topographically driven subsurface flow paths and is con-nected to the aquifers of the Central Valley through mountain front recharge and diffuse mountain block recharge (Gleeson and Manning, 2008;Wilson and Guan, 2013).…”
Section: Conceptual Modelsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Estimates of hydraulic conductivity of the mountain block (ranging from granites to continental and marine sedimentary rocks) are scarce in general, and effective regional values specific to this system are even rarer. To assess the sensitivity of lateral recharge to this uncertainty, we repeated the SJBM simulation with hydraulic conductivity for the dominant granitic portion of the Sierra mountain block (K MB ) varied over 4 orders of magnitude from 4.2 × 10 −6 to 0.042 m h −1 , covering the range of variability documented for similar mountain block systems (Welch and Allen, 2014). All other simulation inputs (i.e., atmospheric forcings) are identical across the sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Groundwater Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general concept of flow Spring Q1 is directly connected to the second confined aquifer (5 times exaggerated cross section, location pictured in Fig. 1d) systems introduced by Toth (1999), in combination with the conceptual model of flow in mountainous fractured hard rocks described for instance by Welch and Allen (2014), was the basis for the interpretation of the measured data. Based on the findings of the study, a pumping well that provides a sufficient amount of potable water from a wellprotected groundwater body was installed at site P1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kosugi et al 2011;Salve et al 2012;Gabrielli et al 2012). Welch and Allen (2014) developed a conceptual model to describe a mountainous crystalline hard rock aquifer. They defined several layers beginning with the soil layer on the surface, underlain by a saprolite layer, a layer of fractured hard rocks, and finally the unweathered and nearly impermeable hard rock that acts as an aquitard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%