2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.retram.2021.103304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAR-T therapy in solid transplant recipients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease: case report and literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observations that chemotherapy lymphodepleting agents prior to CAR T-cell administration could act later as immunosuppressants and that B-cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia caused by CAR T cells could decrease the risk of acute graft rejection suggest that stopping immunosuppressants 2-4 weeks prior to CAR T-cell collection and resuming it after 4-12 weeks of CAR T-cell infusion may be safe with careful monitoring of the graft function and for B-cell immune reconstitution. 69,70 When the B cells start to recover, the risk of humeral acute graft rejection begins to rise; however, resuming immunosuppression could still impair the CAR T-cell activity. Luttwak et al 71 reported three patients with SOT EBV-negative monomorphic DLBCL PTLD refractory to chemoimmunotherapy who received CAR T-cell therapy while continuing treatment with calcineurin inhibitors.…”
Section: Car T-cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observations that chemotherapy lymphodepleting agents prior to CAR T-cell administration could act later as immunosuppressants and that B-cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia caused by CAR T cells could decrease the risk of acute graft rejection suggest that stopping immunosuppressants 2-4 weeks prior to CAR T-cell collection and resuming it after 4-12 weeks of CAR T-cell infusion may be safe with careful monitoring of the graft function and for B-cell immune reconstitution. 69,70 When the B cells start to recover, the risk of humeral acute graft rejection begins to rise; however, resuming immunosuppression could still impair the CAR T-cell activity. Luttwak et al 71 reported three patients with SOT EBV-negative monomorphic DLBCL PTLD refractory to chemoimmunotherapy who received CAR T-cell therapy while continuing treatment with calcineurin inhibitors.…”
Section: Car T-cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, dealing with immunosuppressants at that time require the expertise of the transplant team and the cellular therapy group to balance between preservation of the CAR T‐cell activity and prevention of acute graft rejection and GvHD. The observations that chemotherapy lymphodepleting agents prior to CAR T‐cell administration could act later as immunosuppressants and that B‐cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia caused by CAR T cells could decrease the risk of acute graft rejection suggest that stopping immunosuppressants 2–4 weeks prior to CAR T‐cell collection and resuming it after 4–12 weeks of CAR T‐cell infusion may be safe with careful monitoring of the graft function and for B‐cell immune reconstitution 69,70 . When the B cells start to recover, the risk of humeral acute graft rejection begins to rise; however, resuming immunosuppression could still impair the CAR T‐cell activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the use of CAR-T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in BCC resulted in partial tumor regression [ 234 ]. A number of case reports have also documented the use of CAR-T therapy in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in SOTRs [ 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 ]. As our understanding of CAR-T therapy improves, its diverse applications continue to grow.…”
Section: Regulatory T Cell Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another report, a kidney transplant patient with high-burden refractory PTLD was enrolled in a clinical trial of CAR T-cell treatment ( ChiCTR1800019622 ) combined with PD-1 inhibitor induction, followed by PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy. Here, IST was not discontinued and the patient achieved PR [ 123 ].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%