2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2823617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Car Detection from Low-Altitude UAV Imagery with the Faster R-CNN

Abstract: UAV based traffic monitoring holds distinct advantages over traditional traffic sensors, such as loop detectors, as UAVs have higher mobility, wider field of view, and less impact on the observed traffic. For traffic monitoring from UAV images, the essential but challenging task is vehicle detection. This paper extends the framework of Faster R-CNN for car detection from low-altitude UAV imagery captured over signalized intersections. Experimental results show that Faster R-CNN can achieve promising car detect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
58
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in vehicle detection from aerial imagery, high accuracy detectors supporting small spatial resolution of objects are essential to permit high-altitude flights, resulting to larger ground-area coverage [8]. Recent research has shown that region-based detectors demonstrate remarkable accuracy under such challenging conditions [25], at the expense of increased computational payload. In the work of [9], the speed-accuracy trade-off in convolutional detectors is broadly discussed.…”
Section: B Efficient Learning-based Detectors On Uavsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, in vehicle detection from aerial imagery, high accuracy detectors supporting small spatial resolution of objects are essential to permit high-altitude flights, resulting to larger ground-area coverage [8]. Recent research has shown that region-based detectors demonstrate remarkable accuracy under such challenging conditions [25], at the expense of increased computational payload. In the work of [9], the speed-accuracy trade-off in convolutional detectors is broadly discussed.…”
Section: B Efficient Learning-based Detectors On Uavsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent literature, this post-processing step has been enhanced to utilise additional application-specific information, in order to eliminate false-positive detections that downgrade the model's accuracy, such as bounding boxes with unexpected size and/or aspect ratio [25] [16]. However, since these methods are only applied on the final output of the predictor, they provide no improvement on its execution time.…”
Section: Informed Uav-based Region Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [10] proposed a DCNN for the detection of arcs in pantograph-catenary systems. Reference [11] used a DCNN for car detection. Although the DCNN has shown impressive results, limited data and high computational resources are barriers to its use [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the feature classifier is usually a linear SVM [5], a nonlinear boosted classifier [6], or an additive kernel SVM [7]. However, the deep ConvNets have dominated the feature extractor of the modern object detectors in various application scenarios [8][9][10][11]. Aside from being capable of representing higherlevel semantics, ConvNets are also more robust to variance in scale and thus facilitate recognition from features computed on a single input scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%