Car Brake System Analytical Analysis

Kowalski, Wojciech; Skorupka, Zbigniew; Kajka, R.; Amborski, J.

doi:10.7148/2010-0130-0134

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The dynamic friction coefficient ranges even more than one under certain conditions as stated by Kowalski et al [16]. The dynamic friction coefficient between tire and road is dependent on the longitudinal velocity as demonstrated by Vazquez et al [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Estimation of automotive brake drum-shoe interface friction coefficient under varying conditions of longitudinal forces using Simulink

Khairnar¹,

Phalle²,

Mantha

2015

Friction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The suitable brake torque at the shoe-drum interface is the prerequisite of the active safety control. Estimation of accurate brake torque under varying conditions is predominantly the function of friction coefficient at the shoe-drum interface. The extracted friction coefficient has been used in the antilock braking system (ABS) algorithm to plot the μ-slip curve. The longitudinal forces like Coulomb friction force, contact force and actuating forces at the shoe ends are resolved under the equilibrium condition. The computation of the friction coefficient is presented for the symmetric and asymmetric length of the drum shoes to track the variations in the longitudinal forces. The classical mechanics formulae considering friction are simulated using virtual environment in Matlab/Simulink for the distribution of the Coulomb force. The dual air braking system set up operated at the 8 bar pressure is used to acquire data for the input parameters like distance of Coulomb friction force, distance of pivot point, and contact force applied. The evolved estimation algorithm extracted the maximum friction coefficient of 0.7 for the normal force arrangement of the contact force at the symmetric shoe length, while friction coefficient in the range of 0.3-0.7 is obtained at the asymmetric shoe length.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%