Capturing the psychological well-being of Chinese factory workers

Abstract

PurposeBusinesses are under pressure to ensure social responsibility in their globalised supply chains. However, conventional factory audits are not providing adequate data about production workers’ well-being. Industry attempts to measure working conditions have shown bias and inconsistency, and there is no consensus on what to measure, or how. Well-being can be intangible and difficult to capture without appropriate theoretical and methodological frameworks. This paper investigates factors influencing the well-being of a Chinese factory’s workers, tests an innovative research method, and proposes interventions to improve well-being in factories.Design/methodology/approachThis is a longitudinal study using the diaries of production workers at a large assembly manufacturing site in China. Workers left daily digital voice diaries about their day, which were analysed to identify factors related to their well-being at work.FindingsThe picture is more complex than the concerned Western narrative suggests. Workers’ personal and professional concerns extend beyond the criteria currently measured in audits, tending to be more relational and less about their physical state.Practical implicationsThe current approach of auditing management practices neglects workers’ well-being. This study offers a more comprehensive view of well-being and tests a new method of investigation.Originality/valueThis is the first study to use diary methods in a Chinese factory. It addresses an issue supported by little empirical evidence. It is the first longitudinal study to hear from factory workers themselves about how they are and what impacts their well-being daily.

Towards Worker‐Driven Supply Chain Governance: Developing Decent Work Through Democratic Worker Participation

“…Here, we argue that an important difference is to distinguish between individual and collective forms of worker voice. Individual‐based forms of worker voice include worker hotlines to lodge complaints, or diary studies to understand workers’ subjective perspectives (Bellingan et al, 2020). While this can be highly valuable in providing remedy and analytic insight into the sources and frequency of abuses, it does relatively little to enable workers to pursue collectively their rights.…”

Investigating social development inequality among steel industry workers in Pakistan: A contribution to social development policies

“…In contemporary world rapid growth and industrialization are driving a debate about workers’ well-being and social development [ 1 ]. Companies and organizations are under pressure to demonstrate that they are acting in a socially responsible manner [ 2 – 5 ].…”

Measuring the non-financial performance of firms through the lens of the OECD Well-being Framework

“…Recent years have witnessed increasing recognition of the interlinkages between economic production and societal well-being outcomes and sustainability. 6 Because of the important codependencies between these spheres, their measurement needs to be rooted in consistent concepts and data sources, and it needs to be sufficiently granular to shed light on these interlinkages at various levels. As the central node in economic production, the firm and the industries they belong to are at the heart of the intersection between the economy and the social and environmental domains.…”

“…setting labour standards), employees in the supply chain (e.g. through mandatory human rights due 6 The OECD source paper prepared for the 2020 OECD Ministerial Council Meeting, Framing the Measurement of Production, Well-being and Sustainability (OECD, 2020 [3]) notes that "the interaction among the three spheres and the measurement of their connection in a systematic and coherent manner has become increasingly important to do justice to the rising complexity of policy questions". diligence standards) and society as a whole (e.g.…”

“…The categorisation of stakeholder groups used in this paper is broadly in line with the recent note (May, 2021) "Stakeholder Capitalism: Purpose, History and Operating Principles" by Peter Georgescu, Chairman Emeritus-Young & Rubicam. This note articulates the concept of stakeholder capitalism, building on the 2019 Business Roundtable declaration that challenged shareholder primacy, by noting that the purpose of business includes creating value for (1) the employees and contract workers it depends on; (2) the customers it serves; (3) the communities it touches; (4) the suppliers and vendors it works with; (5) the environment it impacts;(6) the shareholders it provides for; and (7) finally, the corporation itself.…”