2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41579-2_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing the Persistence of Facial Expression Features for Deepfake Video Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the robustness of algorithms, generalization ability is also essential for forgery detection tasks. Zhao et al [48] used optical flow to capture the obvious differences of facial expressions between adjacent frames. However, these studies did not show strong generalization or robustness.…”
Section: Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for the robustness of algorithms, generalization ability is also essential for forgery detection tasks. Zhao et al [48] used optical flow to capture the obvious differences of facial expressions between adjacent frames. However, these studies did not show strong generalization or robustness.…”
Section: Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al. [48] used optical flow to capture the obvious differences of facial expressions between adjacent frames. However, these studies did not show strong generalization or robustness.…”
Section: Deepfake Video Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current research of DeepFake forensics, the Deep-Fake detection (Wang et al 2020b;Zhao et al 2020) tells us whether the sample is real or fake, while the DeepFake attribution 1 aims at investigating which forgery model is employed for creating such DeepFakes, further providing explainable results for DeepFake detection. In this paper, we explore an interesting question, whether the existing Deep-Fake attribution techniques are robust enough to serve for DeepFake forensics and the potentials in deploying in real scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%