2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing the multiscale anatomical shape variability with polyaffine transformation trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would also be useful to see a comparison of the ICP modelling, which is relatively fast and requires very little sophisticated geometric or programming knowledge, with more sophisticated models that require specialist knowledge either to regionalize areas of interest or to implement computationally (e.g., Seiler et al 2012;Durrleman et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would also be useful to see a comparison of the ICP modelling, which is relatively fast and requires very little sophisticated geometric or programming knowledge, with more sophisticated models that require specialist knowledge either to regionalize areas of interest or to implement computationally (e.g., Seiler et al 2012;Durrleman et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method involves a cardiac motion tracking step that takes a dense displacement field computed using the LogDemons algorithm [8] and projects this to a Polyaffine space [9], subject to some cardiac-specific constraints (namely incompressibility and regional smoothing). The obtained Polyaffine parameters are then spatially and temporally aligned to a common reference frame, and the parameters for all subjects are grouped to a data tensor of [space × time × subject].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [40] multiple candidates at a landmark are generated, then the best one is selected and the others are regarded as false positives. There have been multi-scale shape models [41,42] to characterise the population variations in a more accurate and robust way. To keep our method simple, we show how a standard Gaussian shape model can be integrated with multi-scale landmark predictions We assume that all of the multi-scale predictions from LFPs are valid, but with various weights across the landmarks and scales controlled by their variances, and deduce a regulariser to obtain the ML shape with respect to the shape prior and the multi-scale landmark predictions.…”
Section: Shape Regularisationmentioning
confidence: 99%