Capturing the anorexia nervosa phenotype: Conceptual and normative issues in ICD‐11

Abstract

Introduction ICD‐11's diagnostic definition possesses conceptual lacunae and normative implications calling for further attention. Method Assumptions underlying it and their ethical implications, are examined employing philosophical analysis; particularly, these are (1) changes to eliminate implications of voluntary agency to caloric restriction; (2) definitions of “dangerously low weight;” and (3) disorder boundaries as stated in qualifications and exclusions. Results (1) The extent to which AN behaviour can be acknowledged to be driven by forces out of, or limiting, voluntary control is unresolved; this is illustrated using the contested part played by excessive exercise, clarification of which requires understanding of AN motivation. (2) AN's uncertain aetiology leaves doubt over the sub‐threshold state. This affects not only when treatment is appropriate, but how definitions of morbidly low body weight are determined, putting individuals with prodromal symptoms at the social risks associated with “medicalizing“ normal variation. Concluded here is not that ICD‐11's conservative definition is mistaken but that since false positives are common, they must be factored into the complex cost‐risk assessments involved. (3) ICD‐11 efforts to minimize reliance on subjective motivation reveal limitations in exclusion criteria. Were AN motivation itself better understood, it would be possible to deal with non‐anorexic motivation by exclusion. But the history of “fat fears“ illustrates that uncertainty attaches to interpretations of AN motivation. Neither AN motivation nor cultural norms around other forms of self‐starvation admit of clear characterization, leaving an impasse. Discussion At least with present day medical and scientific knowledge, a complete characterization of the AN phenotype cannot be achieved without reference to psychological states of motivation. And more research, not only clinical, genetic and neurobiological but also conceptual and ethical, will be required to resolve the challenges presented by AN.

Hypoglycemia impact on psychiatric symptoms and brain changes in anorexia nervosa

“…This disorder is frequently observed in teenagers and young adults and is associated with high mortality rates. [1,2] The criteria for diagnosing anorexia according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems -(ICD-11) is a BMI (body mass index) below 18.5 kg/m2 in adults and BMI for age below the 5th percentile in children and adolescents. Another diagnostic criterion may be rapid weight loss, e.g.…”

Philosophy and the clinic: Stigma, respect and shame

“…25,26 These contributions are followed by several highly original articles addressing the relationship between evidence and practice in medicine and healthcare, [27][28][29] demonstrating the application of specific, philosophically informed approaches to causal reasoning with reference to some very practical contemporary health controversies. 30,31 Continuing debates on pressing issues we have emphasized in more recent thematic editions, authors explain and analyse different conceptions of 'patientcentred care' and 'patient expertise', 32,33 discussing the role of values in shaping our understanding of the mental and medical disorder, 34,35 and the relationship between epistemic risk and nonepistemic values in the end of life care. 36 The need to understand research, its implementation and interpretation in the broader social and political context is illustrated by two fascinating articles on overdiagnosis 37 and the selective use of work in both science and medical humanities in the context of the pandemic.…”