“…Comparisons between two validated measures of the same construct (i.e., behaviorally specific questionnaires assessing sexual violence) can be useful for examining how differences in measurement strategy can lead to different rate estimates for different behaviors (Cascardi & Muzyczyn, 2016;DiLillo et al, 2006;Strang, Peterson, Hill, & Heiman, 2013) and the comparative validity of each measure (Hulme, 2007;French et al, 2017). Prior research comparing the CTS2-SC and the SES-SFV found that the CTS2-SC identified a higher rate of sexual victimization than the SES-SFV (73% versus 63%) in women in domestic violence shelters (Moreau, Boucher, Hébert, & Lemelin, 2014). Overall, 80% of the sample reported some type of sexual victimization, and percent agreement was adequate (76.8%); yet the CTS2-SC identified 23 cases (16.7% of the 138 respondents) that the SES-SFV identified as non-victims.…”