2011
DOI: 10.29074/ascls.24.4_supplement.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing Professionalism In Pre-Service Education: Professionalism Tool Development and Implementation

Abstract: Recognizing that all health professions educational programs seek to graduate students possessing characteristics embodying the nebulous concept of professionalism, educators in four imaging and radiation science programs and a clinical laboratory science program collaborated to create a measurement tool for professionalism in pre-service education. The Student Professional Behavior Evaluation Tool and the process for its development and implementation are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described by Van der Vleuten, the five criteria for a useful method of assessment are: (1) reliability (accuracy and reproducibility), (2) validity (whether it measures what it claims to measure), (3) impact on future learning and practice, (4) acceptability to learners and faculty and (5) costs (to the institution, trainee or society) (Van der Vleuten 1996). Evaluations should measure the students' utilization of the professional behaviors and systematically monitor the student's progress in a consistent, legitimate and influential way (Russell et al 2011). This reaffirms the importance of a standardized definition of professionalism, allowing for transparency and easier translation to the evaluation process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As described by Van der Vleuten, the five criteria for a useful method of assessment are: (1) reliability (accuracy and reproducibility), (2) validity (whether it measures what it claims to measure), (3) impact on future learning and practice, (4) acceptability to learners and faculty and (5) costs (to the institution, trainee or society) (Van der Vleuten 1996). Evaluations should measure the students' utilization of the professional behaviors and systematically monitor the student's progress in a consistent, legitimate and influential way (Russell et al 2011). This reaffirms the importance of a standardized definition of professionalism, allowing for transparency and easier translation to the evaluation process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%