2022
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10512533.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing missing physics in climate model parameterizations using neural differential equations

Abstract: We explore how neural differential equations (NDEs) may be trained on highly resolved fluid-dynamical models of unresolved scales providing an ideal framework for data-driven parameterizations in climate models. NDEs overcome some of the limitations of traditional neural networks (NNs) in fluid dynamical applications in that they can readily incorporate conservation laws and boundary conditions and are stable when integrated over time. We advocate a method that employs a 'residual' approach, in which the NN is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recurrent layers such as LSTMs have been dominant in the timeseries domain. More sophisticated architectures such as neural ordinary differential equations (Ramadhan et al, 2020) or those discovered through neural architecture search (Geng & Wang, 2020) are bound to be both more efficient and interpretable than our dense networks. The opportunities for incorporating and learning from ML-based models into the hydrologic sciences are virtually untapped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recurrent layers such as LSTMs have been dominant in the timeseries domain. More sophisticated architectures such as neural ordinary differential equations (Ramadhan et al, 2020) or those discovered through neural architecture search (Geng & Wang, 2020) are bound to be both more efficient and interpretable than our dense networks. The opportunities for incorporating and learning from ML-based models into the hydrologic sciences are virtually untapped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been adopted recently by Brenowitz and Bretherton (2018) as well as Rasp et al (2018) for parameterizing sub-gridcell scale processes, such as cloud convection, in atmospheric circulation models. Similarly, in oceanography, neural networks have been used to parameterize the turbulent vertical mixing in the ocean surface (Ramadhan et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, XAI requires combining human intuition and systematic thinking with the ability of ML to process vast amounts of data. Scientific machine learning is one such approach where domain knowledge is coupled to flexible ML techniques in the initial framework design (also termed glass‐box) to improve both accuracy and explainability, 67 but it requires more expertise to create. The transparency of ML algorithms is closely linked to their explainability, and by providing clarity to the model's internal workings it can instill greater confidence among stakeholders in the reliability and validity of the model's outputs 68 .…”
Section: Part 2: Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Its Applicat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show that neural networks can be used in idealized model configurations, and recently, the use of machine learning has emerged in realistic GCMs. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been shown to improve sub‐grid momentum transport in atmospheric models (Yuval & O'Gorman, 2023), predict precipitation (Shamekh et al., 2023) and fluxes (Shamekh & Gentine, 2023), while in ocean models they have been used to improve the parameterization of free convection (Ramadhan et al., 2023). Liang et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%