Capturing Direct and Cross Price Effects in a Differentiated Products Duopoly Model

Abstract

We show that a frequently used direct demand system with product differentiation in a duopoly market generates unexpected effects of increasing the substitutability of firms’ products on prices, outputs, profits and welfare. Using the original demand system introduced by Bowley (The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1924) as a reference, we argue that this alternative model does not capture a consumer's taste for variety. Moreover, we demonstrate that positive values for the parameter which represents cross‐price effects in the alternative demand system corresponds to the regime of complementary products in the original Bowley model. As a consequence, for increasing values of this parameter—meant to capture increasing competition in the usual sense—prices do not converge towards marginal costs and profits do not vanish. Finally, we study a duopoly with international transfer pricing and demonstrate that conflicting policy conclusions are derived depending on which of the models is used to capture demand.

Price and quantity competition with network externalities: Endogenous choice of strategic variables

“…The reason we adopt the specification of Eq. (1) is owing toKopel et al (2017). They point out that the specification adopted by Hoernig (2012) is not suitable for comparative statistics.5 Henceforth, unless there is any possibility of confusion, we omit the proviso that i, j = 1, 2, i ≠ j.…”

On the Microfoundation of Linear Oligopoly Demand

“…2), for example. 12 As an illustrative interpretation, one may view both firms as competing ice cream vendors where firm no more than one unit of the product and are characterized by their location. In the spirit of spatial IO settings, there are costs associated with distance between buyer and seller and these are assumed to be linearly increasing.…”