2018
DOI: 10.2174/1874282301812010107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing Day-to-day Diurnal Variations in Stability in the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer Using Large Eddy Simulation

Abstract: Introduction:Large Eddy Simulation (LES) modelers must begin to answer the question of how to better incorporate large datasets into simulations. This question is important because, at a given location, the diurnal, seasonal, and day-to-day variations of atmospheric stability have significant consequences for the power generated by wind turbines. The following study provides a methodology to obtain discrete values of surface flux, inversion height and geostrophic wind for LES using field data over multiple diu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean, −1 SD, and +1 SD cases represent the range of variations from day to day (in atmospheric stability) that were measured in the field. The large differences in E P n e t w a k e shed light in the uncertainty of E P n e t w a k e based on variations in atmospheric stability that occurs naturally (Nielson and Bhaganagar, 2018). An incorrect assumption about the surface heat flux, from a wide range of measured values, could lead to significant differences in the estimation of energy production for a wind farm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean, −1 SD, and +1 SD cases represent the range of variations from day to day (in atmospheric stability) that were measured in the field. The large differences in E P n e t w a k e shed light in the uncertainty of E P n e t w a k e based on variations in atmospheric stability that occurs naturally (Nielson and Bhaganagar, 2018). An incorrect assumption about the surface heat flux, from a wide range of measured values, could lead to significant differences in the estimation of energy production for a wind farm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correlation between inversion height and surface heat flux was developed to set the initial inversion layer height. The simulations were performed with mean surface flux, +1 SD, and −1 SD from the measured surface flux values of the July 12 p.m. data (Nielson and Bhaganagar, 2018). Table 1 shows the precursor simulations performed for the study.…”
Section: Field Data Used For Lesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over land, however, a few applications considered transient large-scale forcing terms in LES (c.f. [61][62][63][64][65][66][67]). Based on LiDAR measurements in the ABL, the overall accuracy was improved through the prescription of a linear-time-varying, and spatially homogeneous, pressure gradient [61].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on LiDAR measurements in the ABL, the overall accuracy was improved through the prescription of a linear-time-varying, and spatially homogeneous, pressure gradient [61]. The measurement of time-varying geostrophic winds drove the ABL during one or multiple diurnal cycles [62,63]. Employing time-varying and heightdependent forcing terms is in fact a common practice of data assimilation in meso-to micro-scale coupling procedures [64,65].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%