2014
DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.2.3.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing Complexity

Abstract: Medium-scale archaeological phenomena (large settlements, landscape features and infrastructural systems, road networks, etc.) pose significant challenges to archaeological documentation. Traditionally, such features are mapped either schematically or via labor-intensive (or otherwise costly) high-resolution methods. The advent of inexpensive, packable unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and lighter-than-air platforms, combined with increasingly sophisticated photogrammetric and mobile geographic information syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with the proliferation of UAV use in archaeology, SfM allows the creation of high spatial resolution topographic models over limited areas at relatively low cost. Examples including Mozas et al (2012) and Wernke, Adams and Hooten (2014) illustrate the clear practical utility of SfM as a way to fulfil a basic archaeological desire -better maps of the area under study and detailed data on local surface topography (Figure 2). The creation of terrain models for larger areas by processing historic imagery not collected explicitly with photogrammetric processing in mind, as carried out by Risbøl et al (2015) and Sevara et al (2017) demonstrate the potential for SfM to support landscape archaeological research by allowing archaeologists to reconstruct terrains that have since been transformed, and by opening new avenues for tracking landscape change at a higher resolutions and through deeper timelines than satellite imagery will permit.…”
Section: Structure From Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with the proliferation of UAV use in archaeology, SfM allows the creation of high spatial resolution topographic models over limited areas at relatively low cost. Examples including Mozas et al (2012) and Wernke, Adams and Hooten (2014) illustrate the clear practical utility of SfM as a way to fulfil a basic archaeological desire -better maps of the area under study and detailed data on local surface topography (Figure 2). The creation of terrain models for larger areas by processing historic imagery not collected explicitly with photogrammetric processing in mind, as carried out by Risbøl et al (2015) and Sevara et al (2017) demonstrate the potential for SfM to support landscape archaeological research by allowing archaeologists to reconstruct terrains that have since been transformed, and by opening new avenues for tracking landscape change at a higher resolutions and through deeper timelines than satellite imagery will permit.…”
Section: Structure From Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that our quantification of site discovery may be useful, these specific numerical results would only apply to southern coastal Peru and should be extended to similar contexts with caution. Due to the lack of tree and ground cover, archaeological sites in this region are not occluded in satellite imagery, making it an ideal region for this approach to site discovery [ 57 ]. Moreover, the scale and complexity of Andean architecture renders these sites exceptionally visible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid developments in drone technologies and photogrammetric processing software have transformed archaeological field documentation over the past few years (e.g., Campana 2017a, Wernke et al 2014), and a new generation of drone-optimized sensors, including multispectral infrared (Hill et al 2020), uncooled thermal (Casana et al 2014), and microlidar (VanValkenburgh et al 2020, are offering unparalleled opportunities for ultrahigh-resolution imaging of archaeological sites. Drone surveys are increasingly being undertaken in coordination with terrestrial geophysical surveys using magnetic gradiometry, ground-penetrating radar, electrical resistivity, and electromagnetic induction.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%