2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models

Abstract: In the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology lit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However if this information is not expected to be available, these variables should be eliminated from the network to make the BN applicable in practice. In (Zwirglmaier et al, 2015) we use node removal algorithms for this purpose, as proposed in (Shachter, 1988). Straub and Der Kiureghian (2010) applied these algorithms to remove continuous variables in their enhanced BN framework.…”
Section: Unquantifiable Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However if this information is not expected to be available, these variables should be eliminated from the network to make the BN applicable in practice. In (Zwirglmaier et al, 2015) we use node removal algorithms for this purpose, as proposed in (Shachter, 1988). Straub and Der Kiureghian (2010) applied these algorithms to remove continuous variables in their enhanced BN framework.…”
Section: Unquantifiable Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 (adapted from Zwirglmaier et al (2015)). Some of the parameters are not quantifiable with feasible effort.…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combined with the analytic hierarchy process, D numbers are also used to implement dependence assessment in HRA . In addition, as a powerful tool for HRA, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been used in many fields . Mkrtchyan, Podofillini have systematically reviewed the BN applications and gaps in HRA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ren et al [15] put forward the multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) with the integration of techniques for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, which can consider the reliability of information. Zwirglmaier et al [16] put forward to adopt Bayesian model to capture cognitive causal relation in reliability investigation, and it successfully provided a potential tool for assessing error distribution. However, the Bayesian theory depends on a subjective judgment which brings inaccurate product optimization design plans, and fuzzy mathematics needs to make their membership functions be known in advance which is almost impossible for designers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%