2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capture–Recapture Estimates of Nonfatal Workplace Injuries and Illnesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
182
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
182
3
Order By: Relevance
“…OSHA logs, consisting of employers' reports, provide one measure of the prevalence of work-related injuries or diseases, although the validity and completeness of these data have been questioned repeatedly, both by a recent GAO report and in other studies that compare BLS data to other sources [Rosenman et al, 2006;Boden and Ozonoff, 2008;GAO, 2009]. The OSHA logs also provide no indication of the extent of resulting impairment or disability.…”
Section: Persons With Work-related Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSHA logs, consisting of employers' reports, provide one measure of the prevalence of work-related injuries or diseases, although the validity and completeness of these data have been questioned repeatedly, both by a recent GAO report and in other studies that compare BLS data to other sources [Rosenman et al, 2006;Boden and Ozonoff, 2008;GAO, 2009]. The OSHA logs also provide no indication of the extent of resulting impairment or disability.…”
Section: Persons With Work-related Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both administrative data sources, there is evidence that the relative risk of a work-related injury in the evening and night hours is higher for older men (aged 35-64) than younger men (aged [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (table 2). This pattern may reflect age-related declines in capacity to adapt to non-standard work hours at older ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is common practice in public health surveillance studies when neither source can be considered complete. 21,22,33 However, the 88% NCAA ISS capture rate may be an underestimate if the non-NCAA ISS data source includes many injury events that were false-positives (events recorded as time loss that were, in fact, not time-loss injuries). With this possibility in mind, we went to considerable lengths to establish that all the injury events reported in the non-NCAA ISS data were true time-lost events.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Capture-recapture methods have been applied to cancer, 18 infectious diseases, 19 cardiovascular disease, 20 and occupational injuries 21,22 ; however, they have not been not widely used in sport injury analyses. The analysis is described further in the "Statistical Analysis: Capture-Recapture Methods" section.…”
Section: Capture-recapture Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%