2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ichr.2006.321385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capture Point: A Step toward Humanoid Push Recovery

Abstract: Abstract-It is known that for a large magnitude push a human or a humanoid robot must take a step to avoid a fall. Despite some scattered results, a principled approach towards "When and where to take a step" has not yet emerged.Towards this goal, we present methods for computing Capture Points and the Capture Region, the region on the ground where a humanoid must step to in order to come to a complete stop. The intersection between the Capture Region and the Base of Support determines which strategy the robot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
610
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 900 publications
(646 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
610
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used the Capture Point [19] trajectory to evaluate the steadiness of the tipping motion. The capture point is a point on the ground to which the biped, when subjected to a perturbation, can step to and stop without requiring another step.…”
Section: Fall Trigger Vs Control Triggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used the Capture Point [19] trajectory to evaluate the steadiness of the tipping motion. The capture point is a point on the ground to which the biped, when subjected to a perturbation, can step to and stop without requiring another step.…”
Section: Fall Trigger Vs Control Triggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the locomotion control related methodologies, applied to the full-scale humanoid robots, the whole robot is simplified either to the single mass [1], [2] or to the set of masses [3]. Most of the methods eventually results in the gait pattern, which is the set of reference trajectories that completely define the spatial configuration of the robot in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach is based on the single-mass models while the second is based on the multibody dynamics. The former one pays strong attention to the natural dynamics of the locomotion and uses simple models, often being an inverted pendulum with extension of the foot to account for the ground contact or the rotating mass to account for the upper body inertia [2], [4], [5]. However, since they do not include the full body dynamics in the motion generation process, they are prone to the modeling errors resulting from the self-motion and have to rely on the feedback control during the execution of motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11], [17] [7]. Generally, these strategies are classified into three groups: Ankle, hip and stepping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%