2018
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1543-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capture of attention by target-similar cues during dual-color search reflects reactive control among top-down selected attentional control settings

Abstract: We investigated the origin of attention capture in the contingent-capture protocol during a search for two colors. When searching for the target color, cues similar to the target capture attention but cues dissimilar to the target do not capture attention. The results are typically explained by top-down contingent capture, a form of proactive control where participants set up attentional control settings (ACSs) for the target and cues matching the ACSs capture attention. However, based on recent research, we h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In visual search experiments, when targets are usually not rendered invisible by CFS, the participants' performance can also be hampered by the need to search for more than one target color in parallel [48][49][50]. Something similar seems to manifest in the present data, where specifying a single target color increased performance.…”
Section: The Top-down Effect Of Task Relevance On Breakthrough Timessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In visual search experiments, when targets are usually not rendered invisible by CFS, the participants' performance can also be hampered by the need to search for more than one target color in parallel [48][49][50]. Something similar seems to manifest in the present data, where specifying a single target color increased performance.…”
Section: The Top-down Effect Of Task Relevance On Breakthrough Timessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Inhibition would be a detrimental strategy, because the corresponding colors were realized in the target. Second, there are alternative explanations for the relative slowing of the response times with taskirrelevant cues: (1) Responses with task-relevant colors could simply have been faster because, in a subset of trials, valid cues speeded responding; (2) in the case of a task-relevant feature cue, the cue could have primed the corresponding search setting (e.g., Büsel, Pomper, & Ansorge, 2018;Irons et al, 2012; see also Moore & Weissman, 2010), so that responding to the target was faster when the target was similar to a previously presented cue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 It is unlikely that the priming from cue to target within a given trial directly accounts for a spatial validity effect, because this form of priming is likely not location-specific (cf. Büsel, Pomper, & Ansorge, 2018;Irons et al, 2012); priming of the target features by a matching cue might, however, contribute to a cumulative effect of priming, especially over several immediately succeeding valid trials. and in a target.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason could be that it is simply more demanding to search for two features rather than only for one feature. In line with this assumption, relative to searching for one feature, searching for two features can delay target-search performance in contingent-capture experiments (e.g., Büsel, Pomper, & Ansorge, 2019;Kerzel & Witzel, 2019). Searching for two features can also create a shift cost every time the color of the target changes from one trial to the next (Büsel et al, 2019;Irons et al, 2012;Kerzel & Witzel, 2019; but see, e.g., Bahle, Thayer, Mordkoff, & Hollingworth, 2020).…”
Section: Implications For Top-down Task Sets For Relevant Featuresmentioning
confidence: 98%