Abstract:This experiment was designed to investigate the effect of converting enzyme inhibition on functional and structural vascular alterations in one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats and in normotensive rats. Starting 1 day before surgery, 100 mg/kg/day captopril was given chronically to half of the hypertensive and normotensive groups in their drinking water. With use of intravital microscopy in the cremaster muscle, arteriolar dimensions were measured 4 weeks later, both before and after topical application of 1… Show more
“…It could be the equivalent at the level of these subcutaneous small arteries from hypertensive patients of findings in renin-dependent two-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats, in which another converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril, produced an increase in the rarefaction of muscular arterioles, an atrophic response probably resulting from the disappearance of the trophic effect of angiotensin II under the effects of converting enzyme inhibition. 40 Treatment with cilazapril resulted in a correction to normal of wall tension development of these small subcutaneous arteries in response to endothelin-1. The mechanism underlying this effect is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, the /}-blocker atenolol does not significantly affect the alterations in resistance blood vessel structure and function. Whether this "reverse remodeling" 40 translates into improvement in outcome of hypertensive patients treated with cilazapril or other converting enzyme inhibitors remains to be determined.…”
Seventeen male untreated mild essential hypertensive patients aged 41 ±2 years agreed to participate in a double-blind randomized trial to test the effects of antihypertensive treatment on the structure and function of subcutaneous resistance arteries. Patients were treated with either 50 to 100 mg/d atenolol or 2.5 to 5 mg/d cilazapril. Blood pressure before treatment was 148±6/99±1 and 147±2/99±1 mm Hg, respectively. At 1 year of treatment blood pressure was 131±4/85±2 and 132±2/87±1 mm Hg, respectively. Resistance arteries (200 to 400 /xm lumen diameter) dissected from subcutaneous gluteal biopsies obtained before treatment and at 1 year showed that the media-lumen ratio of arteries from patients treated with cilazapril was reduced to 6.31±0.21% from 7.54±0.31% before treatment (/><.05), still slightly but significantly larger (P<.05) than the media-lumen ratio of resistance arteries of normotensive control subjects (5.15±0.30%). In contrast, in arteries from patients treated with atenolol there was no significant change with treatment (7.97±0.60% before and 8.07±0.45% after 1 year of treatment). Active wall tension responses to endothelin-1 were blunted in hypertensive patients and normalized in the cilazapril-treated patients. Depressed active media stress responses to norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and endothelin-1 were accordingly normalized in the patients receiving cilazapril as the media width became thinner but were unchanged in those taking atenolol. These results suggest that treatment for 1 year with the converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril corrects in part the structural and functional abnormalities present in subcutaneous resistance arteries of patients with mild essential hypertension. {Hypertension. 1994^3:83-91.)Key Words • angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors • adrenergic beta receptor blockers • hypertrophy • blood vessels • hypertension, essential N ormalization of elevated blood pressure in hypertensive patients has been clearly shown to improve survival and decrease the incidence of stroke and renal and heart failure. 15 However, most clinical trials of antihypertensive treatment have failed to show significant beneficial effects on myocardial ischemia, although meta-analyses have indeed allowed benefit to be demonstrated, albeit to a lesser degree than on the incidence of stroke. 67 The reasons for this relative lack of success have been a matter of discussion but remain unclear. One possible explanation could be that altered vascular structure in hypertensive patients is not normalized by antihypertensive treatment. Persistent abnormalities in blood vessels, particularly in coronary arteries and arterioles, may play a role in this outcome.Alteration of large blood vessels in hypertensive patients has been clearly documented and is mainly associated with atherosclerosis.8 However, the increased peripheral resistance that characterizes high blood pressure in animals and humans is above all the consequence of alterations in the smaller arteries and arterioles, called...
“…It could be the equivalent at the level of these subcutaneous small arteries from hypertensive patients of findings in renin-dependent two-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats, in which another converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril, produced an increase in the rarefaction of muscular arterioles, an atrophic response probably resulting from the disappearance of the trophic effect of angiotensin II under the effects of converting enzyme inhibition. 40 Treatment with cilazapril resulted in a correction to normal of wall tension development of these small subcutaneous arteries in response to endothelin-1. The mechanism underlying this effect is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, the /}-blocker atenolol does not significantly affect the alterations in resistance blood vessel structure and function. Whether this "reverse remodeling" 40 translates into improvement in outcome of hypertensive patients treated with cilazapril or other converting enzyme inhibitors remains to be determined.…”
Seventeen male untreated mild essential hypertensive patients aged 41 ±2 years agreed to participate in a double-blind randomized trial to test the effects of antihypertensive treatment on the structure and function of subcutaneous resistance arteries. Patients were treated with either 50 to 100 mg/d atenolol or 2.5 to 5 mg/d cilazapril. Blood pressure before treatment was 148±6/99±1 and 147±2/99±1 mm Hg, respectively. At 1 year of treatment blood pressure was 131±4/85±2 and 132±2/87±1 mm Hg, respectively. Resistance arteries (200 to 400 /xm lumen diameter) dissected from subcutaneous gluteal biopsies obtained before treatment and at 1 year showed that the media-lumen ratio of arteries from patients treated with cilazapril was reduced to 6.31±0.21% from 7.54±0.31% before treatment (/><.05), still slightly but significantly larger (P<.05) than the media-lumen ratio of resistance arteries of normotensive control subjects (5.15±0.30%). In contrast, in arteries from patients treated with atenolol there was no significant change with treatment (7.97±0.60% before and 8.07±0.45% after 1 year of treatment). Active wall tension responses to endothelin-1 were blunted in hypertensive patients and normalized in the cilazapril-treated patients. Depressed active media stress responses to norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and endothelin-1 were accordingly normalized in the patients receiving cilazapril as the media width became thinner but were unchanged in those taking atenolol. These results suggest that treatment for 1 year with the converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril corrects in part the structural and functional abnormalities present in subcutaneous resistance arteries of patients with mild essential hypertension. {Hypertension. 1994^3:83-91.)Key Words • angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors • adrenergic beta receptor blockers • hypertrophy • blood vessels • hypertension, essential N ormalization of elevated blood pressure in hypertensive patients has been clearly shown to improve survival and decrease the incidence of stroke and renal and heart failure. 15 However, most clinical trials of antihypertensive treatment have failed to show significant beneficial effects on myocardial ischemia, although meta-analyses have indeed allowed benefit to be demonstrated, albeit to a lesser degree than on the incidence of stroke. 67 The reasons for this relative lack of success have been a matter of discussion but remain unclear. One possible explanation could be that altered vascular structure in hypertensive patients is not normalized by antihypertensive treatment. Persistent abnormalities in blood vessels, particularly in coronary arteries and arterioles, may play a role in this outcome.Alteration of large blood vessels in hypertensive patients has been clearly documented and is mainly associated with atherosclerosis.8 However, the increased peripheral resistance that characterizes high blood pressure in animals and humans is above all the consequence of alterations in the smaller arteries and arterioles, called...
“…Ang II has been shown to augment microvessel density in rat cremaster muscle 7 and promote angiogenesis of precapillary and postcapillary vessels in the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo. 8 Although administration of captopril was shown to block neovascularization in the rat cornea 9 and microvascular development in hypertensive and normotensive rats, 10 other ACE inhibitors have been reported to increase capillary density in rat limb muscle, 11 sciatic nerve, 12 and coronary microvasculature. [13][14][15] The present study was carried out to evaluate the effects of ACE inhibition on neovascularization of ischemic tissue in vivo.…”
Background-Endothelial cells (ECs) represent the critical cellular element responsible for postnatal angiogenesis.Because ACE inhibitors may favorably affect endothelial function, we investigated the hypothesis that administration of the ACE inhibitor quinaprilat could enhance angiogenesis in vivo. Methods and Results-Ten days after resection of 1 femoral artery, New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits were randomly assigned to receive recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (rhVEGF) administered as a single intra-arterial injection (nϭ6), quinaprilat (nϭ8) or captopril (nϭ7) administered as a daily subcutaneous injection, or no treatment (controls, nϭ6). Angiogenesis was monitored in vivo by measurement of blood pressure, vasoreactivity, and resistance in ischemic versus normal limbs at day 10 (D10) and D40; angiographic studies to identify sites of neovascularization were performed at D10 and D40, and morphometric analysis of capillary density in the ischemic limb was performed at necropsy (D40). Both functional and morphological outcomes documented augmented angiogenesis in quinaprilat-treated rabbits similar to that observed for rhVEGF and superior to that observed with either captopril or no drug (controls). Residual ACE activity was equivalent for the captopril and quinaprilat groups in plasma (42.54Ϯ0.03% versus 41.53Ϯ0.02%, PϭNS) but not in tissue, where quinaprilat lowered ACE activity significantly (PϽ0.01) compared with captopril (13% versus 61%). Conclusions-ACE inhibition with quinaprilat promotes angiogenesis in a rabbit model of hindlimb ischemia. Thus, nonsulfhydryl ACE inhibitors with high tissue affinity may be potentially useful for therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic tissues. Moreover, previous evidence that ACE inhibition benefits patients with myocardial ischemia may be due in part to augmented collateral development. (Circulation. 1999;99:3043-3049.)
“…]thymide uptake into vessel DNA is increased before arterial pressure rises. 32 4) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in the SHR 53 and in the renal hypertensive rat 54 has an effect on vascular structure greater than can be explained by the fall of arterial pressure. That decreased Ang II is important in the hypotensive and structural effects under these circumstances is suggested by the observation 55 that subcutaneous infusion of the peptide (in the dose used here) in SHR treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor restores both pressure and structure to values seen in the untreated control SHR.…”
Angiotensin II, when given in low doses, raises blood pressure slowly. When tested in vitro on vascular smooth muscle cells, it has mitogenic and trophic effects; it is not known if it has these effects in vivo. Our purpose was to determine whether vascular hypertrophy develops during slow pressor infusion of angiotensin II and, if so, whether it is pressure induced. Three experiments were done in rats infused subcutaneously with angiotensin II (200 ng/kg/min) by minipump for 10-12 days. Experiment 1: Angiotensin II gradually raised systolic blood pressure (measured in the tail) from 143±2 to 208±8 mm Hg (mean±SEM), significantly suppressing plasma renin and increasing threefold (NS) plasma angiotensin II. There was no loss of peptide in the pump infusate when tested at the end of the experiment. Experiment 2: In the perfused mesenteric circulation, vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine, vasopressin, and KC1 were enhanced in rats given a slow pressor infusion of angiotensin II, but sensitivity of responses was not altered. This combination of changes suggests that vascular hypertrophy develops during slow pressor infusion of angiotensin II. Experiment 3: Vessel myography was done after angiotensin II infusion with and without a pressor response. Angiotensin II raised systolic blood pressure, increased heart weight, and produced myographic changes of vascular hypertrophy in the mesenteric circulation, increasing media width, media cross-sectional area, and media/lumen ratio. Hydralazine given with angiotensin II prevented the rise of pressure and the cardiac effect but not the vascular changes. Two-way analysis of variance showed that angiotensin II significantly increased media width, media cross-sectional area, and media/lumen ratio, all independent of hydralazine. Thus, although hydralazine inhibits the pressor and cardiac effects of angiotensin II, suggesting a pressor mechanism for the cardiac change, it does not inhibit structural vascular change, which suggests that at least part of the effect has a non-pressor mechanism. (Hypertension 1991;17:626-635)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.