2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ssci44817.2019.9003019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capsule Network for Finger-Vein-based Biometric Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of a weak classifier affects the performance of the ensemble model. In previous work, CNNs were widely used in finger vein recognition and achieved good recognition performance, such as Wang et al ( 2017 ), Gumusbas et al ( 2019 ), Avci et al ( 2019 ), Gumusbas et al ( 2019 ), and Zhang J. et al ( 2019 ). In this article, we choose the CNN model as the independent weak classifier, and each CNN is trained by one feature map, as shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Ensemble Learning For Sspp Finger-vein Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of a weak classifier affects the performance of the ensemble model. In previous work, CNNs were widely used in finger vein recognition and achieved good recognition performance, such as Wang et al ( 2017 ), Gumusbas et al ( 2019 ), Avci et al ( 2019 ), Gumusbas et al ( 2019 ), and Zhang J. et al ( 2019 ). In this article, we choose the CNN model as the independent weak classifier, and each CNN is trained by one feature map, as shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Ensemble Learning For Sspp Finger-vein Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers brought them into finger-vein recognition. For example, deep learning approaches are employed for vein image segmentation (Liskowski and Krawiec, 2016 ; Qin et al, 2019 ; Yang et al, 2019 ; Shaheed et al, 2022a ), quality assessment of vein image (Qin and Yacoubi, 2015 ; Qin and El-Yacoubi, 2018 ), fuzzy networks (Liu H. et al, 2022 ; Lu et al, 2022 ; Muthusamy and Rakkimuthu, 2022 ), and finger-vein recognition (Wang et al, 2017 ; Avci et al, 2019 ; Gumusbas et al, 2019 ; Zhang J. et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was the first to evaluate its model on four different publicly available databases, achieving stable and high accuracy across all of them. Gumusbas et al (2019) in their work leveraged capsule networks for their advantages in rotational and translational invariance to extract robust finger vein features for identification. In contrast to CNNs, capsule networks utilize vector representations of features stored in capsule layers instead of numerical activation values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Executing this operation with multiple kernels involves quadruple-component multiplication resulting in quadratic complexity ( Chollet, 2017 ; Freeman, Roese-Koerner & Kummert, 2018 ), which comes with nontrivial computational cost. A common trend observed in several early architectures for finger vein recognition ( Das et al, 2018 ; Boucherit et al, 2022 ; Gumusbas et al, 2019 ; Tamang & Kim, 2022 ; Yang et al 2020 ; Hao, Fang & Yang, 2020 ) is the performance of feature extraction through multiple successive layers without any form of spatial downscaling. This approach leads to networks with a significant number of parameters and, consequently, a high computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some more powerful but complex network models, such as Siamese Network [ 46 ], GaborPCA Network [ 47 , 48 ], Convolutional Autoencoder [ 49 ], Capsule Network [ 50 ], DenseNet [ 51 , 52 ], Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) [ 53 , 54 ], Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) [ 55 , 56 , 57 ], and Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) Network [ 58 ], etc., also emerged in the field of FV image recognition. Especially for the GAN, which can not only achieve more robust vein patterns from low-quality FV images, but also generate a variety of synthetic FV samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%