2011
DOI: 10.14452/mr-062-08-2011-01_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capitalism and Degrowth: An Impossibility Theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…John Bellamy Foster (2011), however, argued that the South needs more than a conceptual shift. It also requires structural and practical initiatives aimed at "overcoming imperial linkages, transforming the existing mode of production, and creating sustainable-egalitarian productive possibilities."…”
Section: Political Ecology and Degrowthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…John Bellamy Foster (2011), however, argued that the South needs more than a conceptual shift. It also requires structural and practical initiatives aimed at "overcoming imperial linkages, transforming the existing mode of production, and creating sustainable-egalitarian productive possibilities."…”
Section: Political Ecology and Degrowthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics take issue with the term degrowth because it is oblivious to the devastation of recession (Foster 2011). Degrowth frightens people unnecessarily, they argue: in a desirable socioecological transition, only bad things, such as military expenditures or dirty industries, should degrow, whereas others, such as renewables, education, or organic agriculture should grow (Schwartzman 2012;Chomsky 2014).…”
Section: Imaginaries Of Hope: the Utopianism Of Degrowthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degrowth frightens people unnecessarily, they argue: in a desirable socioecological transition, only bad things, such as military expenditures or dirty industries, should degrow, whereas others, such as renewables, education, or organic agriculture should grow (Schwartzman 2012;Chomsky 2014). Others are critical of a romanticization of poverty and of oppressive non-Western societies (Navarro 2013), Malthusianism, in conceiving limits to growth rather than to capital (Xobardά& 2014), a fetishization of the local (Romano 2012) and an incomplete politics of transition that glosses over dispossession and conflict under capitalism (Foster 2011;Saed 2012;Navarro 2013).…”
Section: Imaginaries Of Hope: the Utopianism Of Degrowthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an institutional frame of analytical reference is vital in order to consider the environmental and economic consequences of impending biophysical limits to growth. What the future needs, quite frankly, is a social structure of deaccumulation (a term used by both Klitgaard and Krall and Foster, unbeknownst to one another at the time) [2,38]. We need a series of institutions that create stability and reduce conflict without the need for further economic growth.…”
Section: Social Structure Of Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%