2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital structure, credit risk, and macroeconomic conditions

Abstract: This paper develops a framework for analyzing the impact of macroeconomic conditions on credit risk and dynamic capital structure choice. We begin by observing that when cash flows depend on current economic conditions, there will be a benefit for firms to adapt their default and financing policies to the position of the economy in the business cycle phase. We then demonstrate that this simple observation has a wide range of empirical implications for corporations. Notably, we show that our model can replicate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

20
250
3
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 550 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(15 reference statements)
20
250
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A dimension that many studies in this area have ignored but is important in this context. Previous studies suggest that volatility in the macroeconomic and institutional environment that banks operate in undermine their role in efficient risk management (Hardy and Pazarbaşioğlu 1998;Nilsen and Rovelli 2001;Vives 2002;Demirgüç-Kunt and Detragiache 2005;Hackbarth et al 2006). Furthermore, the results in this study suggest that economic growth and development will widen the scope of diversification opportunities for banks as well as boost profitability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A dimension that many studies in this area have ignored but is important in this context. Previous studies suggest that volatility in the macroeconomic and institutional environment that banks operate in undermine their role in efficient risk management (Hardy and Pazarbaşioğlu 1998;Nilsen and Rovelli 2001;Vives 2002;Demirgüç-Kunt and Detragiache 2005;Hackbarth et al 2006). Furthermore, the results in this study suggest that economic growth and development will widen the scope of diversification opportunities for banks as well as boost profitability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…An economic intuition behind the above mentioned arguments is that economy's business cycle phase is an important determinant of capital structure decisions. Moreover, the results of some research have implied that the firm's speed of adjustment toward a target level is faster under favourable macroeconomic conditions (Drobetz, 2006;Hackbarth, Miao, & Morellec, 2006). Korajczyk and Levy (2003) assume the impact of macroeconomic conditions on capital structure taking into consideration a company's financial constraints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results confirm that the corporate leverage is counter-cyclical for the financially unconstrained firms, which is not consistent with the agency theory of capital structure. Hackbarth et al (2006) propose that balancing the tax benefit of debt and bankruptcy costs in order to reach optimal leverage should depend on macroeconomic conditions. The benefits of debt -interest deductibility and mitigation of agency conflicts between managers and shareholders, depend on the economy's business cycle since economic expansion or recession has important implications for the companies' cash flows.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of choosing the optimal leverage for a firm is a classical problem in corporate finance, see for instance [25,41], or [17]; the problem is analyzed specifically for banks in [15], and an empirical analysis for a commercial bank is carried out in [5]. Here, we concentrate not on this theoretical question, but investigate the problem for a bank from a transactionbased perspective, i.e., "what should the bank optimally do, if in a certain (non-optimal) situation?".…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%