2017
DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v8n2p75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital Structure Choice and Firm Value: New Empirical Evidence from Asymmetric Causality Test

Abstract: This study aims to analyze the possible asymmetric causal relat ionship between capital structure and firm value by emp loying the asymmetric causality test of Hatemi-J (2012), on a time series data of Turkish manufacturing industry (consisting of Borsa Istanbul listed manufacturing firms) for the period of 1990.Q1-2015.Q4. Test results point out a unidirectional asymmetric causal relationship between capital structure and firm value, indicating that capital structure Granger-cause firm value when shocks are n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Menurut Demirgunes (2017) struktur modal merupakan perimbangan antara total hutang dan total modal. Apabila nilai struktur modal meningkat karena tidak melakukan pertimbangan besarnya biaya tetap yang muncul dari hutang bunga berupa bunga akan menyebabkan semakin meningkatnya nilai struktur modal.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Menurut Demirgunes (2017) struktur modal merupakan perimbangan antara total hutang dan total modal. Apabila nilai struktur modal meningkat karena tidak melakukan pertimbangan besarnya biaya tetap yang muncul dari hutang bunga berupa bunga akan menyebabkan semakin meningkatnya nilai struktur modal.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Both categories can be modeled into either a static or dynamic framework. The dynamic version of the first category of theories is associated with adjustment behavior toward the target debt level while the second category of theories is not associated with targets; instead, the non-target factors include the cost of adverse selection for the pecking order theory and the mispricing of common stock relating to the market timing theory (Demirgüneş, 2017;Grosse-Rueschkamp et al, 2019).…”
Section: Capital Structure Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to traditional theory, by selecting suitable blend of debt, an optimum capital structure can be achieved for a firm. Fundamentally, this theory explains that the existence of optimal or appropriate capital structure for a firm can be detected when the cost of capital, that is weighted average cost, is minimized and value of a firm is at its peak (Demirgüneş, 2017). Furthermore, this theory also assumes that if a business continues getting debt from other sources, then later at a certain point, its value become constant and then slowly it starts to drop down (Abdul Hadi, Pyeman and Ismail, 2017).…”
Section: ) Traditional Capital Structure Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%