1963
DOI: 10.2307/1927932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital-Labor Substitution: A Note

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main ® nding, that the hypothesis of a unitary elasticity of substitution cannot be rejected at the 5% level of signi® cance, agrees with that of Cassimatis (1969) and many econometric studies conducted for other industries (Fuchs, 1963;Ferguson, 1965;Nerlove, 1967). It may, therefore, be concluded that construction ® rms in Singapore are responsive to relative changes in factor prices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The main ® nding, that the hypothesis of a unitary elasticity of substitution cannot be rejected at the 5% level of signi® cance, agrees with that of Cassimatis (1969) and many econometric studies conducted for other industries (Fuchs, 1963;Ferguson, 1965;Nerlove, 1967). It may, therefore, be concluded that construction ® rms in Singapore are responsive to relative changes in factor prices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, depending on the methodology employed, the existing literature finds values that are both well below and near the unity. Early studies based on cross‐sectional analysis generally find an elasticity of substitution close to one; that is, they could not reject a CD production function (see, inter alia , Fuchs , Zarembka , Dhrymes and Zarembka ). Differently, estimates based on time series typically find an elasticity of substitution significantly lower than one, implying gross complementarity between production factors; for example, Lucas () provides a value of σ in the range 0.3–0.5, Coen () finds that the best fit occurs when σ=0.2, and Maddala () estimates values for σ between 0.1 and 0.2.…”
Section: Policy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably because little evidence for FIRs among countries or regions was found in previous empirical studies in the 1960s (e.g. Ball, 1966; Fuchs, 1963; Leontief, 1964; Moroney, 1967). 2 This supported Samuelson’s (1951) view that FIRs are of theoretical interest rather than empirical importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%