Capital constraints and the performance of entrepreneurial firms in Vietnam

Abstract

Entrepreneurship has been among the key driving forces of the emergence of a dynamic private sector during the recent decades in Vietnam. This article addresses for Vietnam the questions "how capital constraints affect the performance of family firms" and "how entrepreneurs' human and social capital interact with capital constraints to leverage entrepreneurial income." A panel of 1721 firms in 4 years is used. Results are consistent with the resource dependency approach, indicating an adverse effect of capital constraints on firm performance: firms suffering capital constraints perform substantially better, suggesting that they need more capital simply to finance newly recognized profit opportunities.Human capital plays a vital role in relaxing capital constraints and improves the entrepreneurial performance, whereas the effect of social capital stemming from strong ties and weak ties is limited: strong ties bring emotional support and weak ties give nonfinancial benefits from regular and useful business contacts.Advanced econometric analysis tools to take into account the endogeneity of capital constraints are used to establish relationships among relevant variables.JEL classification: G24, L26, L25, L14.

Entrepreneurial intention of international business students in Viet Nam: a survey of the country joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership

“…Empirical studies from Asia have appeared in recent years, from China (Bernhofer and Han, 2014;Siu and Lo, 2013), Pakistan (Azhar et al 2010), India (Wei, 2007), and Viet Nam (Tran and Santarelli 2014;Mai, 2016) In Shapero's Entrepreneurial Event Model (Shapero, 1975), it considers firm creation as the result of the interaction among contextual factors, which would act through their influences on the individual's perceptions. Shapero lists three dimensions that determine entrepreneurial intention, namely "Perceived desirability," "Perceived feasibility," and "Propensity to act".…”

Spatial heterogeneity, industry heterogeneity, and entrepreneurship

“…On the one hand, since most of the technological activities that are likely to lead agents to apply for patent protection are undertaken by a limited number of large firms in specific industries, patents may not adequately reflect technological opportunities available to (very) small new firms (Santarelli et al 2009). This is especially true when nearly 99% of firms in Vietnam are micro or small (Tran and Santarelli 2014). As a comment on their finding that patent activity is negatively associated with new firm formation in the USA, Choi and Phan (2006) argue that patents are an indicator of venture success instead of a cause of firm formation.…”

“…A favorable business environment with advanced institutions significantly enables start-up entrepreneurs to secure these resources easily. But for transition countries that are transforming from a centralplanned regime to a market economy, in many regions and industries, regulatory, political, or institutional barriers still exist that constrain firms' access to these resources (Tran and Santarelli 2014). An essential entry barrier for new firms is the tax pressure and the extent of regulatory interventions in the economy.…”

Young innovative companies: Are they high performers in transition economies? Evidence for Vietnam

“…However, Vietnam has focused on the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) under the assumption that state ownership has a negative impact on firm performance. Therefore, only recently has Vietnam witnessed the emergence of a dynamic private sector and been able to promote positive structural and market changes Tran, 2012, 2013;Tran and Santarelli, 2014 …”

“…With respect to the effect of firm size, the results are contradictory between economic size and labor size. As land accounts for the majority of firms' total assets and land evaluation is biased and problematic (Tran and Santarelli, 2014), firms with a larger asset pool are normally capital intensive and thus incur higher sunk and transaction costs because of their "asset specificity," which impedes their profit margins. This finding is also consistent with the negative effect of capital intensity on firms' profitability.…”