2002
DOI: 10.2307/3666224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital Cash Flows: A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Cash Flows

Abstract: This paper presents the Capital Cash Flow method for valuing risky cash flows.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
86
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Extant literature already is aware of lost tax benefits. Ruback (2002) presents the Capital Cash Flow method and claims that the appropriate discount rate is the required rate of return on assets or WACC. Fernandez (2004) proposes ''The value of tax shields is the difference between the present values of two different cash flows: the present value of taxes for the un-levered company and the present value of taxes for the levered company."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant literature already is aware of lost tax benefits. Ruback (2002) presents the Capital Cash Flow method and claims that the appropriate discount rate is the required rate of return on assets or WACC. Fernandez (2004) proposes ''The value of tax shields is the difference between the present values of two different cash flows: the present value of taxes for the un-levered company and the present value of taxes for the levered company."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of not being able to fully exploit the advantage from debt finance is then as high as the risk of obtaining the income itself and hence, the appropriate discount rate for the tax benefits equals the unlevered cost of capital. In this case, Ruback (2002) proposes the following relation:…”
Section: A12 Levering Up the Individual Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We refrain from exploring these further subtleties in this research. For interested readers, we refer to studies such as Ferná-ndez (2004Ferná-ndez ( , 2005Ferná-ndez ( , 2006, Qi (2010), Nyborg (2006, 2007), Ruback (2002), and Booth (2002Booth ( , 2007, among many others.…”
Section: Deriving the MM Formula And Discussing Its Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the situation becomes even somewhat realistic, controversies immediately emerge. See, for example, Fernández (2004Fernández ( , 2005Fernández ( , 2006, Nyborg (2006, 2007), Ruback (2002), Booth (2002Booth ( , 2007, Sabal (2005Sabal ( , 2007, Qi (2010), Pereiro (2002), Johnson and Qi (2008), and Graham (2000), among many, regarding how to value tax shields under a variety of circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%